<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>louisgray.com - Latest Comments in http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/04/twitter-caps-following-limits-denting.html</title><link>http://louisgray.disqus.com/</link><description>A Silicon Valley Blog for Early Adopters and Tech Geeks</description><atom:link href="https://louisgray.disqus.com/thread_7703/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 16:52:04 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/04/twitter-caps-following-limits-denting.html</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/04/twitter-caps-following-limits-denting.html#comment-12046730</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thank you for the insight Louis...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I find it highly irritating that twitter can't even &lt;br&gt;eliminate the programming glitches in their front&lt;br&gt;end, much less the goofy limitations...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;it's awful confusing, but you shed some&lt;br&gt;light on it, thanks...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Jeff Davis CEO&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://WorkAtHomeJobsNow.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="WorkAtHomeJobsNow.com"&gt;WorkAtHomeJobsNow.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">blujam</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 16:52:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/04/twitter-caps-following-limits-denting.html</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/04/twitter-caps-following-limits-denting.html#comment-8696436</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Interesting stuff. The trouble with spammers is they are like badly behaved children, they need constant supervision. I'm sure the tweet team did not want to have to deal with that side of things, who does? Perhaps people will migrate to a slicker service and we will fight the same battle there, or perhaps Twitter will revolutionize the way spam is handled without effecting their service. Lets hope for the later.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Al Mac</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 23:45:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/04/twitter-caps-following-limits-denting.html</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/04/twitter-caps-following-limits-denting.html#comment-8598388</link><description>&lt;p&gt;twitter was designed in response to sms txt messages as is the 140 characters but they are stuck in their old model and believing in their own propaganda&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;twitter as i wrote yesterday in a tweet is about follwoing ideas/people not just people to cap twitter at 2000 following by some arbitrary nonsense defeats it purpose and potential as an open inviting social sculpture - i have a tag #end2000followlimit - its just a way of saying i think twitter is running with their shoes tied together - they are falling in to the abyss of not listening to their audience and believing in their own propaganda - facebook mistake to twitters benefit among other things is there 5000 limit which is also crazy for people who have more followers they can't follow - i can't follow my own family and friends right now unless i delete some or somebody has enough of my nonsense - so actually facebook made twitter more then it is by playing the same limitation game - do you think chris brogan and garyvee and many others would have stayed with had they had 2000 caps - food for thought geo geller&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">geogeller</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 01:06:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/04/twitter-caps-following-limits-denting.html</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/04/twitter-caps-following-limits-denting.html#comment-8588959</link><description>&lt;p&gt;So has Twitter jumped the shark?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bill Sodeman</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 19:14:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/04/twitter-caps-following-limits-denting.html</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/04/twitter-caps-following-limits-denting.html#comment-8584868</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It always amazes me when service providers in the social media arena fails to communicate with the community that drives their service.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mysticventures</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 16:55:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/04/twitter-caps-following-limits-denting.html</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/04/twitter-caps-following-limits-denting.html#comment-8567823</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Louis, this twitter cap is pure BS ...dev's should go on strike! ....... :)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;N'ways : I just wish the Suggested User list would never existed.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Wrong people are put on the list and don't deserve to be promoted by that devil's ev list :).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It's same like BS with Facebook Ego....if Julia Allison wouldn't do a great BJ to Zuckerberg , she would of never been promoted on FB....well now she is... :) there I said it hahahah.......&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">@JoeHobot</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 09:03:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/04/twitter-caps-following-limits-denting.html</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/04/twitter-caps-following-limits-denting.html#comment-8566620</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I wonder if there's actually a scaling problem with the Twitter software and their dictating how Twitter is best used is actually a smoke screen for poorly designed software? &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave Saunders</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 07:47:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/04/twitter-caps-following-limits-denting.html</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/04/twitter-caps-following-limits-denting.html#comment-8566593</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think Twitter is completely wrong in telling the public how Twitter is and isn't best used. Can you imagine visiting a party and refusing to accept a business card from someone who asks for yours? Most would see you as an arrogant snob. Saying that you can't follow everyone who follows you creates the same sort of elitist air through Twitter as well.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As for their suggestion that "no one can keep up with so many followers," Twitter isn't email. Run one of the many fine Twitter clients like TweetDeck to keep an eye out for conversations in which you're interested and see what's happening in your Twitter stream here-and-now, but scroll back and see what your list has been up to since you last logged in? C'mon, we barely do that with email, why would you do that with Twitter? &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave Saunders</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 07:45:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/04/twitter-caps-following-limits-denting.html</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/04/twitter-caps-following-limits-denting.html#comment-8559976</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This new decision must be revenge. For several months ending last Thursday, I was following approximately 10% of my followers. After abruptly changing my Twitter strategy to follow everyone and further auto-follow, not to mention follow folks in neither action, I'm now prevented from following more.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It must be revenge. So.. now I go to &lt;a href="http://twitter.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="twitter.com"&gt;twitter.com&lt;/a&gt; and see who I can unfollow so I can follow someone I just tweeted with, but then I'll bet the auto-follow will kick in and BAM again.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This new policy bites, and Robert Scoble nailed why.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ari Herzog</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 22:55:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/04/twitter-caps-following-limits-denting.html</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/04/twitter-caps-following-limits-denting.html#comment-8506902</link><description>&lt;p&gt;So what about the 1.1 ratio or 110% formula for following..?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">US</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 16:18:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/04/twitter-caps-following-limits-denting.html</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/04/twitter-caps-following-limits-denting.html#comment-8488294</link><description>&lt;p&gt;But, how is this affecting Robert Scoble? ;)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Seriously, whenever Twitter institutes one-size-fits-all solutions to problems they see they are demonstrating blindness to their greatest strength: Twitter is open and flexible enough for users to use it in radically different ways.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It wouldn't take more than average design and development effort to implement limitations that overwhelmingly affect only the spammies and kooks.  They should aim higher in their constraints.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">cleveridea</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 12:19:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/04/twitter-caps-following-limits-denting.html</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/04/twitter-caps-following-limits-denting.html#comment-8484823</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Great post ! @ihospitality&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Gary Tripp</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 10:15:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/04/twitter-caps-following-limits-denting.html</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/04/twitter-caps-following-limits-denting.html#comment-8480846</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Twitter made a very conscious effort to nurture these applications - and they still do.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">alex</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 05:36:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/04/twitter-caps-following-limits-denting.html</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/04/twitter-caps-following-limits-denting.html#comment-8480807</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Twitter has designed a very clever tool and despite the various bumps in the road they have clearly made some good decisions. Good design is not about leaving everything optional and up to the user but to make the right choices for users so they do not have to. So if one feels the need to follow all their followers simply to make them feel good (because it is not practical to really follow thousands of people) I think Twitter is totally right to take measures to stop that.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This is just like the 5000 friends cap on facebook were some very vocal user made a lot of noise. There  the answer was not to up the limit but to change the paradigm by introducing fan pages to the mix.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">alex</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 05:32:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/04/twitter-caps-following-limits-denting.html</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/04/twitter-caps-following-limits-denting.html#comment-8480210</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That stinks.If twitter does start capping followers they won't have an issue for too long as this opens up a market for a new mini blog site to put them out of business simply by offering no limit following. This is a dumb move on twitters behalf.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Scott Manesis</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 04:19:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/04/twitter-caps-following-limits-denting.html</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/04/twitter-caps-following-limits-denting.html#comment-8479164</link><description>&lt;p&gt;:-)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">guruvan (Rob Nelson)</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 02:16:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/04/twitter-caps-following-limits-denting.html</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/04/twitter-caps-following-limits-denting.html#comment-8479016</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Nice chrisloft.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andy Bakun</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 02:15:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/04/twitter-caps-following-limits-denting.html</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/04/twitter-caps-following-limits-denting.html#comment-8479015</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Twitter caps - OPRAH KNOWS ALL ABOUT TWITTER CAPS&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chris Loft</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 02:15:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/04/twitter-caps-following-limits-denting.html</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/04/twitter-caps-following-limits-denting.html#comment-8479014</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;lt;sarcasm&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/sarcasm&amp;gt; lol! gotta use the tags sometimes&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">guruvan (Rob Nelson)</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 02:13:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/04/twitter-caps-following-limits-denting.html</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/04/twitter-caps-following-limits-denting.html#comment-8479013</link><description>&lt;p&gt;guruvan, I know (that was sarcasm).  -- Can we get some sarcasm metadata flag, FF? COMEON!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andy Bakun</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 02:12:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/04/twitter-caps-following-limits-denting.html</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/04/twitter-caps-following-limits-denting.html#comment-8479012</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Robert: Yeah, I got carried away there for a minute :-)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ken Sheppardson</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 02:11:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/04/twitter-caps-following-limits-denting.html</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/04/twitter-caps-following-limits-denting.html#comment-8479011</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Andy: The limits that they're using are dead wrong to achieve their stated goals, and the goal you're suggesting&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">guruvan (Rob Nelson)</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 02:11:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/04/twitter-caps-following-limits-denting.html</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/04/twitter-caps-following-limits-denting.html#comment-8479010</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Come on, folks; by using caps, twitter is _protecting_ the social graph! If everyone was linked to everyone else, there'd be no useful information to mine. Like who you should follow to reach your follow limit.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andy Bakun</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 02:09:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/04/twitter-caps-following-limits-denting.html</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/04/twitter-caps-following-limits-denting.html#comment-8479009</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Ken: totally wrong. I know several such hands that Twitter has bitten.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Robert Scoble</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 02:06:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/04/twitter-caps-following-limits-denting.html</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/04/twitter-caps-following-limits-denting.html#comment-8478882</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The fix for this is to have Twitter allow DMs from people you don't follow, if you select that option. The fix is *not* to follow all 12,000 people back, because then your timeline is too full to be actually useful. Unless you only use Twitter for DMs and @replies, in which case you might as well use email.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Peter</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 02:04:30 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>