<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>louisgray.com - Latest Comments in http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/04/tweetie-desktop-for-mac-is-clean-simple.html</title><link>http://louisgray.disqus.com/</link><description>A Silicon Valley Blog for Early Adopters and Tech Geeks</description><atom:link href="https://louisgray.disqus.com/thread_706/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 11:20:42 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/04/tweetie-desktop-for-mac-is-clean-simple.html</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/04/tweetie-desktop-for-mac-is-clean-simple.html#comment-8420921</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I really like using Tweetdeck and how they continue to develop it.  This sounds like a good program but not sure if it's worth changing for.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">craig</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 11:20:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/04/tweetie-desktop-for-mac-is-clean-simple.html</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/04/tweetie-desktop-for-mac-is-clean-simple.html#comment-8357939</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm getting addicted to Nambu using the "middle" view option. (It has three UI options that you get to by clicking icons up in the top left corner. The "middle" icon takes you to a UI that looks just like an RSS news reader.)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rex Hammock</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 19:49:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/04/tweetie-desktop-for-mac-is-clean-simple.html</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/04/tweetie-desktop-for-mac-is-clean-simple.html#comment-8356119</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This could be the one thing that might lure me away from Nambu. Looks amazing. I'll be trying it out tomorrow.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Beth Gramling Sanders</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 17:41:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/04/tweetie-desktop-for-mac-is-clean-simple.html</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/04/tweetie-desktop-for-mac-is-clean-simple.html#comment-8347578</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I, like many others, love Nambu. Since Nambu is already thinking ahead and planning for future FriendFeed support, I think I'll keep using it. :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">EricaJoy</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 09:54:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/04/tweetie-desktop-for-mac-is-clean-simple.html</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/04/tweetie-desktop-for-mac-is-clean-simple.html#comment-8346681</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm looking forward to this app.  I like Nambu but I'm always looking for something new.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Gunny Wallen</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 08:19:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/04/tweetie-desktop-for-mac-is-clean-simple.html</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/04/tweetie-desktop-for-mac-is-clean-simple.html#comment-8346438</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Robert: I have a big thing against Air (and other such "bloat tools"), so would always choose a native app like Nambu or Tweetie. If you opt for the multi-column mode of Nambue (and you can choose a more "Tweetie-fied" look if you prefer) then you get something that looks (to me) a lot like Tweetdeck and certainly fills your monitor&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bob Walder</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 07:53:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/04/tweetie-desktop-for-mac-is-clean-simple.html</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/04/tweetie-desktop-for-mac-is-clean-simple.html#comment-8341487</link><description>&lt;p&gt;If Twitter bought any Twitter client, they would buy TweetDeck.  One of Twitters original investors was Betaworks, and Betworks also invested in TweetDeck.  Betaworks seems to always cross promote the different apps that they own, they also have a history of their portfolio companies buying their other portfolio companies.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;StockTwits, &lt;a href="http://bit.ly" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="bit.ly"&gt;bit.ly&lt;/a&gt; both included as defaults in TweetDeck, both backed by Betaworks. Summize, bought by Twitter; Summize, also backed by Betaworks.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jstrellner</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 22:33:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/04/tweetie-desktop-for-mac-is-clean-simple.html</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/04/tweetie-desktop-for-mac-is-clean-simple.html#comment-8339832</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for this post.  I'm a huge Tweetie fan on the iPhone, have seen the atebits video, and am very much looking forward to seeing this on Monday.  I'm glad to hear you like what you've seen.  I hope this is priced reasonably ...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">patrickj</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 20:56:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/04/tweetie-desktop-for-mac-is-clean-simple.html</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/04/tweetie-desktop-for-mac-is-clean-simple.html#comment-8338257</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Don't hold your breath for group support in Tweetie - the Tweetie  author spells this out in a recent blog post &lt;a href="http://blog.atebits.com/2009/02/twitter-groups/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://blog.atebits.com/2009/02/twitter-groups/"&gt;http://blog.atebits.com/200...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;He also talks about the OAuth issue in a separate blog  post:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://blog.atebits.com/2009/02/fixing-oauth/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://blog.atebits.com/2009/02/fixing-oauth/"&gt;http://blog.atebits.com/200...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;If you are in to groups on a Mac client, and you don't like using Air, try Nambu. I don't know about a non-Air client on the PC that supports groups.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Arthur Alston</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 18:53:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/04/tweetie-desktop-for-mac-is-clean-simple.html</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/04/tweetie-desktop-for-mac-is-clean-simple.html#comment-8337417</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Looks awesome, but no grouping?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Grouping is the feature which makes twitter usable from a reader perspective. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bob Knightly</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 17:40:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/04/tweetie-desktop-for-mac-is-clean-simple.html</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/04/tweetie-desktop-for-mac-is-clean-simple.html#comment-8337285</link><description>&lt;p&gt;he means Twitter OAuth not OAuth in general..&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Paul Stamatiou</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 17:29:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/04/tweetie-desktop-for-mac-is-clean-simple.html</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/04/tweetie-desktop-for-mac-is-clean-simple.html#comment-8337308</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Regarding the lack of groups. From what I've seen @atebits holds values in certain things (e.g. defaulting to via: rather than RT). However he did make RT an option in the end, so perhaps he'll do the same for groups? Anyway. I'm looking forward to this - anything to get away from AIR apps, though I use Twitterfall most of the time anyway.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jalada</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 17:23:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/04/tweetie-desktop-for-mac-is-clean-simple.html</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/04/tweetie-desktop-for-mac-is-clean-simple.html#comment-8336673</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That's like saying email will buy outlook.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">evantravers</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 16:42:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/04/tweetie-desktop-for-mac-is-clean-simple.html</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/04/tweetie-desktop-for-mac-is-clean-simple.html#comment-8336726</link><description>&lt;p&gt;If OAuth is still so "beta/alpha", why is it that FF's implementation seems to work just fine?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Leather ♥ Donut</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 16:40:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/04/tweetie-desktop-for-mac-is-clean-simple.html</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/04/tweetie-desktop-for-mac-is-clean-simple.html#comment-8336725</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Stay: Say what you will, but my understanding is that Twitter's OAuth is 'textbook' with respect to the spec. Not sure past experience is relevant in this context.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">coldbrew</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 16:34:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/04/tweetie-desktop-for-mac-is-clean-simple.html</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/04/tweetie-desktop-for-mac-is-clean-simple.html#comment-8336522</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Leather, OAuth is still *very* beta. I have a hard enough time with the stuff Twitter has that's not in beta, but until we can expect not to have the code changed every week it doesn't make sense to implement OAuth. It's still very buggy.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jesse Stay</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 16:20:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/04/tweetie-desktop-for-mac-is-clean-simple.html</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/04/tweetie-desktop-for-mac-is-clean-simple.html#comment-8336521</link><description>&lt;p&gt;How is it that NONE of these clients are using OAuth??!?!? Seriously, people need to get with the program already.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Leather ♥ Donut</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 16:19:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/04/tweetie-desktop-for-mac-is-clean-simple.html</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/04/tweetie-desktop-for-mac-is-clean-simple.html#comment-8336271</link><description>&lt;p&gt;What about setting up groups (re:Tweetdeck) so you can organize your twitter feed? That seems like that is the one thing that is missing.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Amani</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 16:14:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/04/tweetie-desktop-for-mac-is-clean-simple.html</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/04/tweetie-desktop-for-mac-is-clean-simple.html#comment-8334973</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I have never liked Tweetdeck, which took up both real estate and resources. But I will have a problem with Tweetie, too, unless it supports FF and &lt;a href="http://identi.ca" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="identi.ca"&gt;identi.ca&lt;/a&gt;, as Seesmic desktop does. Ultimately, I want a one-stop shop.  But I guess I'm not the market.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">hardaway</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 15:08:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/04/tweetie-desktop-for-mac-is-clean-simple.html</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/04/tweetie-desktop-for-mac-is-clean-simple.html#comment-8334859</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I prefer desktop applications for almost everything, but I thought I was in the minority on that. Everyone seems more interested in web-based mail/IM, but dedicated applications for Twitter are so often trumpeted. I'm not sure what to think about that, but I know I'd like to see a really nice application for XMPP(does Twitter still support this?) and SIP that is extensible. AIR is a memory hog, so Tweetdeck et al. are not acceptable.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">coldbrew</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 14:46:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/04/tweetie-desktop-for-mac-is-clean-simple.html</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/04/tweetie-desktop-for-mac-is-clean-simple.html#comment-8333941</link><description>&lt;p&gt;So now I have to buy a Mac?? I love Tweetie on my iphone. Hopefully it will recieve some PC-ification. I def. agree that Tweetdeck taking over your whole screen is annoying.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Len "I'm Still a PC for now" Kendall&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Len Kendall</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 14:11:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/04/tweetie-desktop-for-mac-is-clean-simple.html</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/04/tweetie-desktop-for-mac-is-clean-simple.html#comment-8333703</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Mike: Don't think Twitter will ever buy a client. Especially one without a Windows component. Robert: I really like Nambu so far. I've never really gotten into Tweetdeck, something about the UI is weird. Tweetie looks pretty cool but the lack of groups is a huge problem for me.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brandon Titus</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 13:49:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/04/tweetie-desktop-for-mac-is-clean-simple.html</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/04/tweetie-desktop-for-mac-is-clean-simple.html#comment-8333476</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm really enjoying Nambu. I didn't really get into TweetDeck too much. I think it was something about the UI (not to mention the slowness).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I like Tweetie but no groups is a big problem. I was hoping the iPhone Tweetie would get groups at some point as well. Maybe they'll both get it at the same time. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bjtitus</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 13:45:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/04/tweetie-desktop-for-mac-is-clean-simple.html</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/04/tweetie-desktop-for-mac-is-clean-simple.html#comment-8333326</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Seriously doubt it. I can't imagine twitter really buying any client. It just doesn't make sense in my opinion. Not to mention, they would ONLY do it if there was a windows version.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bjtitus</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 13:36:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/04/tweetie-desktop-for-mac-is-clean-simple.html</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/04/tweetie-desktop-for-mac-is-clean-simple.html#comment-8333013</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Bob: I like the "take over your screen" approach of TweetDeck better. Why? I have a whole computer dedicated to running it. Nambu is interesting, but I got used to TweetDeck and didn't see much of a reason to switch.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Robert Scoble</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 13:08:00 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>