<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>louisgray.com - Latest Comments in http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/03/can-microblogging-power-blog-community.html</title><link>http://louisgray.disqus.com/</link><description>A Silicon Valley Blog for Early Adopters and Tech Geeks</description><atom:link href="https://louisgray.disqus.com/thread_6386/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 10:27:44 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/03/can-microblogging-power-blog-community.html</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/03/can-microblogging-power-blog-community.html#comment-7254244</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This is an interesting idea: It's a network tool that's similar to Twitter concept, yet in a smaller scale, which provides an option other than forum/message board alone. Am I getting this correctly? Then for those who's interested, they just need to install the widget/tool on their blog and .. that's it?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;if the blogger/site owner could use both application wisely, that just might work. But would it affect the page loading time in anyhow? Just wondering. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ching Ya</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 10:27:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/03/can-microblogging-power-blog-community.html</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/03/can-microblogging-power-blog-community.html#comment-7249985</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think having private, smaller micro-blogs is a good idea and it's gonna happen whether or not people think it's a good idea or not. It would serve the same purpose as sites like &lt;a href="http://ning.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="ning.com"&gt;ning.com&lt;/a&gt; that allow you to make your own private social networks.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Scott Pantall</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 02:56:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/03/can-microblogging-power-blog-community.html</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/03/can-microblogging-power-blog-community.html#comment-7236909</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Looks like Presently is truly Twitter, I just got a fail whale :-)&lt;br&gt;----------&lt;br&gt;Leo, Been following your setup of Twit Army. Did you and Evan ever figure out how different instals of Laconica interact - member of one can post on others with registration just required on one, etc.? &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">PXLated</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 11:14:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/03/can-microblogging-power-blog-community.html</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/03/can-microblogging-power-blog-community.html#comment-7236212</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Interesting.  And there's even more evolution in this space than most are aware.  &lt;a href="http://Present.ly" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="Present.ly"&gt;Present.ly&lt;/a&gt; (Yammer competitor with SaS &amp;amp; behind firewall products for Corps and Orgs) launched a public facing 'microblogging community for professionals' (&lt;a href="http://www.presently.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.presently.com"&gt;http://www.presently.com&lt;/a&gt;) at SXSW yesterday.  As Linkedin is to Facebook, &lt;a href="http://Presently.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="Presently.com"&gt;Presently.com&lt;/a&gt; is to Twitter.   &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jeff C</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 10:42:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/03/can-microblogging-power-blog-community.html</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/03/can-microblogging-power-blog-community.html#comment-7236099</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The general idea of twitter, publicly broadcast messages, does not lend itself well to good conversation. In addition, several websites would like to have more of a community based on their site. The only option previously was forums or message boards. A local twitter or laconica installation gives sites a simpler community option. This is not mean to replace Twitter, just add more features to a blog.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">robdiana</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 10:34:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/03/can-microblogging-power-blog-community.html</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/03/can-microblogging-power-blog-community.html#comment-7236023</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Rob, let's talk offline and I can probably let you see what we're doing.&lt;br&gt;It's very impressive! (If you're married your wife will want to see it as&lt;br&gt;well - that goes for Louis and Kristine, too)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jesse Stay</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 10:29:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/03/can-microblogging-power-blog-community.html</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/03/can-microblogging-power-blog-community.html#comment-7235974</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Cool, I did not know you were working on this for clients. I would be very interested to learn how difficult the process really is. My main concern with the idea is that installation for most people would be painfully difficult.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">robdiana</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 10:24:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/03/can-microblogging-power-blog-community.html</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/03/can-microblogging-power-blog-community.html#comment-7235958</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Based on the posts from Dave, I figured you were using a Laconica install. I think the "follow" concept within a community would be pointless as everyone is mostly there for the same reason. If the install becomes simple enough it could be a very powerful community builder for smaller blogs.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">robdiana</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 10:22:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/03/can-microblogging-power-blog-community.html</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/03/can-microblogging-power-blog-community.html#comment-7235863</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I am concerned about this idea. Does it create new walled gardens? One of the things I love about Twitter is that it is default public.  I hate not being able to find what's said on a topic - I think that was the problem with blog comments until Disqus, backtype, etc opened those up.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I guess I don't understand the problem with using Twitter to talk about a particle blog or blog post?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JMaultasch</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 10:13:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/03/can-microblogging-power-blog-community.html</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/03/can-microblogging-power-blog-community.html#comment-7235809</link><description>&lt;p&gt;btw, it was my hiatus from Twitter last year that helped me discover this potential. :-)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jesse Stay</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 10:07:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/03/can-microblogging-power-blog-community.html</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/03/can-microblogging-power-blog-community.html#comment-7235799</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I talked about this last August and its potential for brands to embrace this. I've been working on it with several clients and we're in weeks of launching some *very* cool and innovative stuff that will hit very niche audiences, and due to brand loyalty, I think will be pretty popular. I'm glad Winer is supporting this - we'd love to have him help promote if he's interested in the cause.  &lt;a href="http://Laconi.ca" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="Laconi.ca"&gt;Laconi.ca&lt;/a&gt;'s feature-set kicks Twitter's butt, and better yet, it integrates with Twitter and soon will also integrate with Facebook as well.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://louisgray.com/live/2008/08/identica-and-power-of-microbranded.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://louisgray.com/live/2008/08/identica-and-power-of-microbranded.html"&gt;http://louisgray.com/live/2...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Of course, you can expect me to write about it (and hopefully others will support!) when we go live in the next several days.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jesse Stay</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 10:06:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/03/can-microblogging-power-blog-community.html</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/03/can-microblogging-power-blog-community.html#comment-7235601</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I reposted this on my own feed. It's definitely food for thought!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Starshadow Rivaulx</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 09:36:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/03/can-microblogging-power-blog-community.html</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/03/can-microblogging-power-blog-community.html#comment-7235492</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This is an experiment we tried some time ago at TWiT and it's been a rousing success. A microblog focused around a community is a very different experience from the hurly burly of Twitter, and more satisfying in many ways. One also tends to use a small microblog differently - the public stream, for instance, is much more useful. I don't even follow anyone; I just read the public stream. We used Laconica for the TWiT Army install and it's working very nicely. &lt;a href="http://army.twit.tv" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://army.twit.tv"&gt;http://army.twit.tv&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">leolaporte</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 09:33:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/03/can-microblogging-power-blog-community.html</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/03/can-microblogging-power-blog-community.html#comment-7235463</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Post by Rob Diana: &lt;a href="http://friendfeed.com/robdiana" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://friendfeed.com/robdiana"&gt;http://friendfeed.com/robdiana&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Louis Gray</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 09:28:00 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>