louisgray.com - Latest Comments in http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/07/real-time-search-not-whats-most.htmlhttp://louisgray.disqus.com/A Silicon Valley Blog for Early Adopters and Tech GeeksenSun, 12 Jul 2009 08:56:34 -0000Re: http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/07/real-time-search-not-whats-most.htmlhttp://blog.louisgray.com/2009/07/real-time-search-not-whats-most.html#comment-12538500<p>what is "now"? whoops, there it goes into the past. let's try again... now iiiiiiiiis -- HERE! darn it ... it was here for a second (a second?) and now now's gone.</p><p>"now" it seems cannot be.</p><p>either be happy with now's cousin, "superrecent," or hang on for what's really going to matter: Future.</p><p>search that anticipates what's *going* to happen. ahh, now that would be wow -- better than now.</p>sonicgleekSun, 12 Jul 2009 08:56:34 -0000Re: http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/07/real-time-search-not-whats-most.htmlhttp://blog.louisgray.com/2009/07/real-time-search-not-whats-most.html#comment-12496063<p>What is ever most important "right now?"</p><p>I don't want to be a cynic. But the speed of info is fast enough today. What bits of information are needed right now instead of 20 minutes from now? Traffic jams perhaps? Anything else? Then again, the more important the information is, the more accurate is should be.</p>Matt SorecoSat, 11 Jul 2009 01:10:31 -0000