<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>louisgray.com - Latest Comments in http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/05/pr-pitches-promise-to-trade-diggs-for.html</title><link>http://louisgray.disqus.com/</link><description>A Silicon Valley Blog for Early Adopters and Tech Geeks</description><atom:link href="https://louisgray.disqus.com/thread_226/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 18:31:30 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/05/pr-pitches-promise-to-trade-diggs-for.html</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/05/pr-pitches-promise-to-trade-diggs-for.html#comment-10326990</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I got a couple of these as well.  Tossers ...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">patrickj</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 18:31:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/05/pr-pitches-promise-to-trade-diggs-for.html</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/05/pr-pitches-promise-to-trade-diggs-for.html#comment-10321624</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I've been offered money to review something before. In the end I spent so long thinking about whether or not it was a good idea that I missed the deadline for it. My idea was, rather than spam up my regular blog feed at 14sandwiches with a sponsored  post, I'd create a separate page on my blog for the (clearly marked) advertorial. That way people can read it if they like without having it forced on them. Does that seem like a good solution? I'd certainly never go down the Diggs route - very underhand.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Martin Bryant</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 11:00:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/05/pr-pitches-promise-to-trade-diggs-for.html</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/05/pr-pitches-promise-to-trade-diggs-for.html#comment-10321620</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This has to be one of the lamest practices I've seen. I'm not sure which is worse, offering to pay you for a good review, of this. This seems more underhanded.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">guruvan (Rob Nelson)</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 10:49:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/05/pr-pitches-promise-to-trade-diggs-for.html</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/05/pr-pitches-promise-to-trade-diggs-for.html#comment-10313823</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That is quite interesting, Louis.  OMG, it is these types of things that give our industry such a bad  wrap.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This type of behavior symbolizes the type of gold rush-something for nothing mentality that has become so common place within certain circles of the web lately.  Thanks for bringing it to light.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Benin (@BeninB)</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 08:12:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/05/pr-pitches-promise-to-trade-diggs-for.html</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/05/pr-pitches-promise-to-trade-diggs-for.html#comment-10312151</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm pretty sure that someone somewhere accepted this offer :(&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Yuvi Panda</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 05:16:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/05/pr-pitches-promise-to-trade-diggs-for.html</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/05/pr-pitches-promise-to-trade-diggs-for.html#comment-10309437</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The scary part is that not all bloggers have your mindset (or lack of commercialization), and inevitably this type of PR will become more common.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Soso Sazesh</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 00:18:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/05/pr-pitches-promise-to-trade-diggs-for.html</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/05/pr-pitches-promise-to-trade-diggs-for.html#comment-10309058</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Its begun.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I just hope you don't become as intolerable as Scoble.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">adorno</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 23:53:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/05/pr-pitches-promise-to-trade-diggs-for.html</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/05/pr-pitches-promise-to-trade-diggs-for.html#comment-10308679</link><description>&lt;p&gt;A PR person might also want to learn  proper punctuation and sentence structure.  Additionally, pitching without four letter works is also good form.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;"If the review is great we will digg it as hell"&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Sentences like this make a pitch look like it was generated from a button-mashing factory in some remote part of the world. &lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brett Morrison</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 23:32:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/05/pr-pitches-promise-to-trade-diggs-for.html</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/05/pr-pitches-promise-to-trade-diggs-for.html#comment-10308637</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think the typo in their email is appropriate "digg it as hell" :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kristen kuhns</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 23:29:11 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>