<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>louisgray.com - Latest Comments in http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/03/britney-spears-passes-obama-for-most.html</title><link>http://louisgray.disqus.com/</link><description>A Silicon Valley Blog for Early Adopters and Tech Geeks</description><atom:link href="https://louisgray.disqus.com/thread_050/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 20:05:01 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/03/britney-spears-passes-obama-for-most.html</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/03/britney-spears-passes-obama-for-most.html#comment-7692440</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I don't know what's worse ghostwriters or people who would be angry at them. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">VlogHog</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 20:05:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/03/britney-spears-passes-obama-for-most.html</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/03/britney-spears-passes-obama-for-most.html#comment-7615372</link><description>&lt;p&gt;So tired of this story being linked to.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Richard Azia</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 15:45:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/03/britney-spears-passes-obama-for-most.html</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/03/britney-spears-passes-obama-for-most.html#comment-7615166</link><description>&lt;p&gt;@Allen, if it's bait, it's not good bait. The story is relevant, factual and timely. And @BCK, if there's a measurement out there to rank folks, people tend to note who's on top. Last night, who is on top changed. My guess is that other blogs, had they written it, would have been more widely distributed.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Louis Gray</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 15:43:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/03/britney-spears-passes-obama-for-most.html</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/03/britney-spears-passes-obama-for-most.html#comment-7598240</link><description>&lt;p&gt;seems the twittersphere is running on empty of relevant stories to cover&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">BCK</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 11:16:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/03/britney-spears-passes-obama-for-most.html</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/03/britney-spears-passes-obama-for-most.html#comment-7597428</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I fall into the camp that it just doesn't matter to me anymore. Ev and Biz are playing the wizard behind  the curtain with all the celebrities. If we really put things into perspective without the new "very subjective" suggested users you'd still have people like Scoble in the top 50. All the celeb accounts are increasing by 6-8K because everyone new that signs up is automatically following half of them unless they opt-out.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I guess the strategy is good to get a wider audience onto Twitter, but I think it's alienating the people who worked hard to actually earn their social capital on the platform.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;R&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ryan Stephens</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 10:23:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/03/britney-spears-passes-obama-for-most.html</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/03/britney-spears-passes-obama-for-most.html#comment-7597202</link><description>&lt;p&gt;When you consider several hundred (or several thousand or ten thousand, etc) of those 620,000+ followers are either inactive or since-suspended, why obsess over numbers?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ari Herzog</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 10:02:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/03/britney-spears-passes-obama-for-most.html</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/03/britney-spears-passes-obama-for-most.html#comment-7596798</link><description>&lt;p&gt;i call bait&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Allen Stern</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 09:10:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/03/britney-spears-passes-obama-for-most.html</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/03/britney-spears-passes-obama-for-most.html#comment-7596797</link><description>&lt;p&gt;OMFG!!! who cares anyway...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dobromir Hadzhiev</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 09:08:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/03/britney-spears-passes-obama-for-most.html</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/03/britney-spears-passes-obama-for-most.html#comment-7594974</link><description>&lt;p&gt;and for the record, nor do I. But surely, it's yet another sign of the End Times! :)&lt;br&gt;And yes I do recall the Britney employee disclosing those details right at the beginning.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">reechard</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 03:43:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/03/britney-spears-passes-obama-for-most.html</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/03/britney-spears-passes-obama-for-most.html#comment-7594888</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Only by one...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">daryllorette</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 03:28:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/03/britney-spears-passes-obama-for-most.html</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/03/britney-spears-passes-obama-for-most.html#comment-7593832</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It's all so fascinating to watch the "race" on Twitter! If the President would just be able to tweet a bit more now, he might gain more followers. I guess first one to a million followers gets a prize? hehee. I'm for quality than quantity. &lt;br&gt;@marismith&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mari Smith</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 00:49:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/03/britney-spears-passes-obama-for-most.html</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/03/britney-spears-passes-obama-for-most.html#comment-7593654</link><description>&lt;p&gt;'Member that chat we had about number of followers representing some level of quality?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark VandenBerg</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 00:28:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/03/britney-spears-passes-obama-for-most.html</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/03/britney-spears-passes-obama-for-most.html#comment-7593430</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It's official, twitter has jumped the shark.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Adam Pieniazek</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 00:08:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/03/britney-spears-passes-obama-for-most.html</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/03/britney-spears-passes-obama-for-most.html#comment-7593497</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Sweet baby infant jesus....&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rahsheen ™</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 00:03:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/03/britney-spears-passes-obama-for-most.html</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/03/britney-spears-passes-obama-for-most.html#comment-7593341</link><description>&lt;p&gt;No.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kamilah Gill</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 23:55:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/03/britney-spears-passes-obama-for-most.html</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/03/britney-spears-passes-obama-for-most.html#comment-7593188</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Have we colonized another planet, yet? This one's collective head is emptying at an alarming rate. I want off.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MiniMageAdoptsBorgBabies</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 23:40:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/03/britney-spears-passes-obama-for-most.html</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/03/britney-spears-passes-obama-for-most.html#comment-7593187</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Kill me.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Graham English</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 23:33:00 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>