<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>louisgray.com - Latest Comments in louisgray.com: You Can Never Have Enough Bandwidth. Ever.</title><link>http://louisgray.disqus.com/</link><description>A Silicon Valley Blog for Early Adopters and Tech Geeks</description><atom:link href="https://louisgray.disqus.com/louisgraycom_you_can_never_have_enough_bandwidth_ever/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 00:57:16 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: You Can Never Have Enough Bandwidth. Ever.</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2008/12/you-can-never-have-enough-bandwidth.html#comment-4706255</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Nobody ever says they have enough bandwidth, or that they are paying a  &lt;br&gt;fair price. I know that by being in the Bay Area, it's a rare thing to  &lt;br&gt;run into problems, which is why this night's example was one I thought  &lt;br&gt;to share.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Louis Gray</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 00:57:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: You Can Never Have Enough Bandwidth. Ever.</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2008/12/you-can-never-have-enough-bandwidth.html#comment-4946927</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I keep running into upload limitatons.  Uploading pics and movies of the baby takes way longer than I'd like. I hope providers start increasing upload speed like they have been doing downloads.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Neil</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2008 13:39:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: You Can Never Have Enough Bandwidth. Ever.</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2008/12/you-can-never-have-enough-bandwidth.html#comment-4655659</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Never stop expecting more. There are place around the world and even in this counttry that offer more, though my neighborhood isn't one of those. I'm in the same boat as you are right now :(&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Josh Peters</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2008 13:38:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: You Can Never Have Enough Bandwidth. Ever.</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2008/12/you-can-never-have-enough-bandwidth.html#comment-4636842</link><description>&lt;p&gt;With more and more of the electronics that people use in the home using a network to do their thing it doesn't surprise me that you would have an issue like this. Although, I do want to ask how long does it usually take Time Machine to backup your laptop over the network? I've thought about setting that up but it would seem to take too long to me. Especially since I would have to go through the network, to another computer and then to an external hard drive connected via USB.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mathewballard</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2008 12:05:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: You Can Never Have Enough Bandwidth. Ever.</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2008/12/you-can-never-have-enough-bandwidth.html#comment-4946913</link><description>&lt;p&gt;VIrgin Media is offering 50Gb rates now, at a price though.  I'm in their area but happy spending £15 a month on max 8Gb unlimited atm.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kol Tregaskes</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2008 09:01:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: You Can Never Have Enough Bandwidth. Ever.</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2008/12/you-can-never-have-enough-bandwidth.html#comment-4633059</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The problem is not about bandwidth but queuing latency here. Time to study network QoS options, man. All the batch copies should have lower priority than interactive or email traffic.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">vicaya</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2008 04:16:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: You Can Never Have Enough Bandwidth. Ever.</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2008/12/you-can-never-have-enough-bandwidth.html#comment-4632645</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Think of it this way too: Most bandwidth consumed (backups aside) is also paid with some sort of attention span cost. Once the video quality of what we're downloading becomes as good as our eyes will ever be able to discern, we've reached a natural cap.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I have about a hundred hours of History Channel recordings  on one of my TiVos that remain unwatched as living proof.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Joost Schuur</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2008 02:46:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: You Can Never Have Enough Bandwidth. Ever.</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2008/12/you-can-never-have-enough-bandwidth.html#comment-4632542</link><description>&lt;p&gt;To be fair, you're mixing local bandwidth with traffic outside of your home network. Your time machine backup and TiVo to TiVo transfer isn't going to impact your Amazon/AppleTV downloads. At least not significantly.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I'm also not sure that recording a new show off of cable impinges on your Internet bandwidth. It's not like that data wouldn't have reached your house anyway. You just decided to record it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Joost Schuur</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2008 02:28:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: You Can Never Have Enough Bandwidth. Ever.</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2008/12/you-can-never-have-enough-bandwidth.html#comment-4632380</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Filling it up takes a whole new meaning when it's just 256kbps big (and slows down to about 56 when a couple of undersea cables get cut)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Yuvi Panda</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2008 01:55:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: You Can Never Have Enough Bandwidth. Ever.</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2008/12/you-can-never-have-enough-bandwidth.html#comment-4632601</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You are of course right. But it is fun to think about how if you press  &lt;br&gt;enough buttons, the data can begin to flow in every direction, and  &lt;br&gt;there's always more data available than you can possibly consume.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Louis Gray</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2008 01:38:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: You Can Never Have Enough Bandwidth. Ever.</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2008/12/you-can-never-have-enough-bandwidth.html#comment-4632051</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Just shows that users advance beyond what users are "perceived" to need. Back in the mid 1990s we had to justify our use of the Internet. Earlier this year Dave Winer was told by his provider that he was using too much bandwidth.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;A family of four, in which two of the four are not yet surfing the Internet, theoretically doesn't need that much bandwidth. Then again, people theoretically don't need petabytes either. Digital video is changing a lot of things.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ontarioemperor</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2008 00:55:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: You Can Never Have Enough Bandwidth. Ever.</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2008/12/you-can-never-have-enough-bandwidth.html#comment-4946912</link><description>&lt;p&gt;hahahahaa !&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Susan Beebe</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2008 00:52:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: You Can Never Have Enough Bandwidth. Ever.</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2008/12/you-can-never-have-enough-bandwidth.html#comment-4632016</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Sounds like a good plan. And in case anyone is skeptical... I changed the WiFi network so I'm browsing on my neighbor's unprotected network, which has plenty of pipe available. Mine is no doubt still impacted. Nice to have as a backup!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Louis Gray</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2008 00:51:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: You Can Never Have Enough Bandwidth. Ever.</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2008/12/you-can-never-have-enough-bandwidth.html#comment-4631999</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Agreed! I will practically never ever move from my apartment. It's tied to the fiber lines that go around downtown/midtown Atlanta and I get a top download of 80mbps and upload of ~37megabits/sec. :-) All for $22/month. Can't be beat.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Paul Stamatiou</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2008 00:46:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: You Can Never Have Enough Bandwidth. Ever.</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2008/12/you-can-never-have-enough-bandwidth.html#comment-4632069</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Ontario, meanwhile, I'm still at the point where I read "family of  &lt;br&gt;four" and wonder who you're talking about. :-)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Louis Gray</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2008 00:01:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: You Can Never Have Enough Bandwidth. Ever.</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2008/12/you-can-never-have-enough-bandwidth.html#comment-4946911</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I literally jumped on my neighbor's open wireless network to post this. Meanwhile, I've maxed my pipe out. :-)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Louis Gray</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Dec 2008 23:45:00 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>