<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>louisgray.com - Latest Comments in louisgray.com: What Google Chrome Gets Right</title><link>http://louisgray.disqus.com/</link><description>A Silicon Valley Blog for Early Adopters and Tech Geeks</description><atom:link href="https://louisgray.disqus.com/louisgraycom_what_google_chrome_gets_right/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 07:33:44 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: What Google Chrome Gets Right</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2008/09/what-google-chrome-gets-right.html#comment-2891197</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I have never ever changed my web browser i’ve always used IE because i’ve been so use to it even if it was a little slow. but now Chrome in five minutes has changed my mind about browsing the web it’s made it a clean neat and simple process i’ve always wondered why nobody made it this simple and now someone has. THANKS TO THE GOOGLE CHROME TEAM!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Blackjack Probability</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 07:33:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: What Google Chrome Gets Right</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2008/09/what-google-chrome-gets-right.html#comment-2390974</link><description>&lt;p&gt;there are so many advantages and features with Chrome, such as it's speed, for example; now if only they would take care it's flighty cookie management...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">film fan</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 18:26:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: What Google Chrome Gets Right</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2008/09/what-google-chrome-gets-right.html#comment-2236754</link><description>&lt;p&gt;In fact incognito mode must be enabled when creating a new tab.  It then is enabled *for that tab* until the tab (or, if you make it a window, that window) is closed.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Phil Glockner</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 16:56:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: What Google Chrome Gets Right</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2008/09/what-google-chrome-gets-right.html#comment-2236495</link><description>&lt;p&gt;My assumption is that when you turn it on, you need to turn it off, or  &lt;br&gt;it stays on. It's the same way Safari handles it. You may want to  &lt;br&gt;check the settings each time you start Chrome if Incognito Mode is  &lt;br&gt;important for you.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Louis Gray</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 16:47:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: What Google Chrome Gets Right</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2008/09/what-google-chrome-gets-right.html#comment-2236106</link><description>&lt;p&gt;IS IT POSSIBLE TO SWITCH ON INCOGNITO MODE PERMANANTLY ON GOOGLE CHROME&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MARK</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 16:38:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: What Google Chrome Gets Right</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2008/09/what-google-chrome-gets-right.html#comment-2151811</link><description>&lt;p&gt;A lot of things it gets right, apparently. Another field of dominance, another opportunity.. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Stu</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 18:34:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: What Google Chrome Gets Right</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2008/09/what-google-chrome-gets-right.html#comment-2138388</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yeah, what's up with that?  They really should be supporting their own technologies like bookmarks and tighter integration with notebook. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Phil Glockner</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 23:35:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: What Google Chrome Gets Right</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2008/09/what-google-chrome-gets-right.html#comment-2138347</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You may be right about Chrome being already in use on a lot more PCs than Opera.  However, Opera is a scrappy browser that is not only multi-platform (even Solaris, OS/2 and Be!), but also has released a decent mobile version.  I'd say we can't count Opera out yet.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Phil Glockner</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 23:32:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: What Google Chrome Gets Right</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2008/09/what-google-chrome-gets-right.html#comment-2105863</link><description>&lt;p&gt;lol @ Opera and @ "time will tell if it becomes a strong contender against ... Opera"&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I dunno, but i wouldn't be the least bit surprised to learn that in it's few days of being available for download (on a single operating system no-less) it has already crushed Opera's desktop market-share... lol. Opera has a tiny and, more notably, stagnant market share... it is not a contender and never will be. (I'm not an Opera fan, can you tell? hehehe.)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Matt Shaulis</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 10:42:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: What Google Chrome Gets Right</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2008/09/what-google-chrome-gets-right.html#comment-2103071</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The lack of Google Bookmarks integration is the thing that's stopping me from using Chrome fulltime.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I use Google Bookmarks for sites I use regularly as it allows me to access the same set of bookmarks from any browser on nay computer, I then use delicious as a place to put all the stuff I find interesting and want to access at some point in the future.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">andydavies</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 07:01:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: What Google Chrome Gets Right</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2008/09/what-google-chrome-gets-right.html#comment-2102400</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I noticed that the results from 'Google Advanced News Search - Beta' don't have as many options at the bottom of the results page. When viewed in Chrome, there is just one option. When viewed in Windows there are four.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I use the fourth option often; rss feed in google reader&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Wallace</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 04:01:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: What Google Chrome Gets Right</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2008/09/what-google-chrome-gets-right.html#comment-2095682</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Nice.  A subtle way of pointing out comparatively how Chrome is doing, memory-wise, vs. other browsers, perhaps?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Phil Glockner</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 21:10:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: What Google Chrome Gets Right</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2008/09/what-google-chrome-gets-right.html#comment-2095663</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Good point, Tim.  However, by providing the ability to make web app shortcuts, they have a built-in way to compete with Mozilla's Prism project and Fluid for Mac OS X.  One thing I mention in my article is that web-based applications are on the rise.  As these products start becoming more competitive with more traditional standalone applications, the need for this sort of 'instancing' will rise as well.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Phil Glockner</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 21:08:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: What Google Chrome Gets Right</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2008/09/what-google-chrome-gets-right.html#comment-2095541</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Nice. I didn't know about that link. Good stuff, thanks!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Phil Glockner</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 20:56:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: What Google Chrome Gets Right</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2008/09/what-google-chrome-gets-right.html#comment-2094033</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Here's a feature I don't understand.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You can turn any page into an application shortcut, so you can launch it in a chrome-less window as an "app". That's just fine, but it doesn't fit the "cloud" strategy, because if I go to a different machine, my shortcuts don't come with me. I can add to the bookmarks toolbar for quick navigation, but they don't come with me either.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I would like to see a "navigation" toolbar, which shows shortcuts that are stored "in the cloud" so they come with me. The omni bar and history is fine I guess, but I don't want to have to hit a key to swap between sites I open a lot. I just want to point and click.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I would have thought that if google are following a cloud strategy, it would have made more sense for them to add a google bookmarks option to the bookmarks toolbar. That would even get me off delicious for these sort of bookmarks.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Maybe I miss the whole new navigation paradigm, but having to keystroke to navigate is a pain. I would also like to be able to drop the omnibar down (like in firefox) for click only access to recent history.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tim</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 19:04:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: What Google Chrome Gets Right</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2008/09/what-google-chrome-gets-right.html#comment-2063796</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The simple approach is really appealing.  i still have to test out to see how much resources are used when loading adobe flash sites on multiple tabs.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">stone</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 17:54:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: What Google Chrome Gets Right</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2008/09/what-google-chrome-gets-right.html#comment-2061257</link><description>&lt;p&gt;about:memory also gives you information about other browsers (IE or FF)  that are running on the user's computer.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">atul</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 17:33:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: What Google Chrome Gets Right</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2008/09/what-google-chrome-gets-right.html#comment-2061214</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I like google chrome, its very fast, but i will keep my firefox ;-)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">saint germain</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 17:30:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: What Google Chrome Gets Right</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2008/09/what-google-chrome-gets-right.html#comment-2060785</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://hwrms.com/blog/?p=363" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://hwrms.com/blog/?p=363"&gt;http://hwrms.com/blog/?p=363&lt;/a&gt; has more information on a few more tools via "about:" including an easter egg.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">atul</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 17:00:42 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>