<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>louisgray.com - Latest Comments in louisgray.com: Twitter Planning to Open Up the Firehose "by Thanksgiving"</title><link>http://louisgray.disqus.com/</link><description>A Silicon Valley Blog for Early Adopters and Tech Geeks</description><atom:link href="https://louisgray.disqus.com/louisgraycom_twitter_planning_to_open_up_the_firehose_by_thanksgiving/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 16:27:21 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: Twitter Planning to Open Up the Firehose "by Thanksgiving"</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2008/11/twitter-planning-to-open-up-firehose-by.html#comment-3599086</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You do have to give Twitter credit for building a super easy to use service that has attracted a large and growing user base.  Gutsy investors must feel that there will be a way to make money at some point I guess.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Todd Dewell</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 16:27:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: Twitter Planning to Open Up the Firehose "by Thanksgiving"</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2008/11/twitter-planning-to-open-up-firehose-by.html#comment-3597520</link><description>&lt;p&gt;sbtodd, I agree - they have so many options, yet they aren't embracing any of them.  I wonder what their investors are saying right now.  I certainly wouldn't want to invest in a company with that type of attitude.  API is an excellent way to monetize.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jesse Stay</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 15:08:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: Twitter Planning to Open Up the Firehose "by Thanksgiving"</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2008/11/twitter-planning-to-open-up-firehose-by.html#comment-3596047</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I wonder if this could be a possible path for Twitter to get some revenue.  GNIP has a freemium model where the service is free, but if your volume exceeds a certain level you start to pay for the service&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Todd Dewell</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 13:40:26 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>