-
Website
http://www.louisgray.com/live/ -
Original page
http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/01/theres-no-way-twitter-is-worth-250.html -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
charlieanzman
60 comments · 11 points
-
Jesse Stay
221 comments · 70 points
-
Ari Herzog
43 comments · 21 points
-
ChangeForge | Ken Stewart
133 comments · 18 points
-
drewolanoff
64 comments · 53 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
FTC Disclosures Made Simple For Bloggers With Conflicts
6 days ago · 46 comments
-
Still Waiting for An Evil Google? It's Not Going to Happen.
6 days ago · 30 comments
-
Fighting Bots With Bots on Twitter, Leveraging SocialToo
1 day ago · 5 comments
-
Simler Adds Likes, Favorite Tags, Revamps Homepage
1 day ago · 4 comments
-
Gowalla Raises $8.4 Million for Location Check-in Service
1 day ago · 2 comments
-
FTC Disclosures Made Simple For Bloggers With Conflicts
This new freindfeed service sounds very interesting., any idea when it might be ready?
It's 13 Hrs later, and I just found out you haven't lost your mind. I should have read some of the other comments, but I didn't this time. Rob and a bunch of other contributes did the same thing not long ago. I was going to erase this , but I still stick by what I said. I'm just a little embarrassed that I didn't know what was going on. LOL very loud!
Well, in IRC you could set your /away message.
And also all the eggdrop bots with lots of tasks.
Twitter just hooked up SMS and a web interface.
Venture capitalists are aware of the global macro economic trends and have surely assessed the downsides to the deal. If they choose to invest it is either because they are privy to plans unbeknown to us that make them confident that Twitter is a good bet in this environment, or they're incredibly stupid. And while the latter is completely plausible the former seems more likely.
When you look at the landscape of standing Web 2.0 companies, many have already been overvalued and funded, making the venture capitalist options as follows: a) sit on money, b) get a tiny chunk in severely overvalued companies (like LinkedIn, etc.) c) reinvest in existing portfolio companies d) try for a chunk of the non-overvalued front runners (Twitter) d) take a flier on a earlier stage firm that is not as established.
It makes the decision more defensible in my opinion.