<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>louisgray.com - Latest Comments in louisgray.com: The Gray Family Upgrades from Flickr to SmugMug</title><link>http://louisgray.disqus.com/</link><description>A Silicon Valley Blog for Early Adopters and Tech Geeks</description><atom:link href="https://louisgray.disqus.com/louisgraycom_the_gray_family_upgrades_from_flickr_to_smugmug/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 15:04:34 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: The Gray Family Upgrades from Flickr to SmugMug</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2008/07/gray-family-upgrades-from-flickr-to.html#comment-1053234</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yea, it seems like a pretty nice site, but I can't see myself ever paying for a service like that. Right now, all my photos go into Adobe's Photoshop Express, great on-site editing and decent storage. It even lets you sign in and edit photos from a whole bunch of other services within the Photoshop Express interface, including Facebook, Flickr, and Photobucket. Photoshop Express is a great service, a little heavy on the RAM, but a fantastic good looking service with great built-in photo editing tools. If they get that to output a photostream the same way SmugMug or Flickr does, the service could really take off. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AramZS</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 15:04:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: The Gray Family Upgrades from Flickr to SmugMug</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2008/07/gray-family-upgrades-from-flickr-to.html#comment-1051346</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hrm, I think that SmugMug is great if you're into the professional photography side of things, but Louis, you're a huge social media guy.  I'm not sure I agree with the switch.  Personally, I've paid for 3 years of Flickr so far and I'm not converting to SmugMug unless I go into professional photography. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tamar</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 12:18:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: The Gray Family Upgrades from Flickr to SmugMug</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2008/07/gray-family-upgrades-from-flickr-to.html#comment-1048464</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hello, I think it is a very interesting move. Did you try / compare with Picasaweb?&lt;br&gt;Thanks&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David Nicault</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 05:16:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: The Gray Family Upgrades from Flickr to SmugMug</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2008/07/gray-family-upgrades-from-flickr-to.html#comment-1047982</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I don't think the space-eating RAW format is suitable for internet use... yet.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I only use JPG format (for the pictures, obviously, and others for the short videos).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;What I do is export the pics in JPG format from my camera to my PC.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Then I do the basic treatments (remove red eyes, crop, straighten, brighten, whatever) locally.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Then re-shrink a little more at 90% JPG compression to have smaller files.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And THEN, I upload to Flickr.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As you seem to have more "professional" needs, perhaps you would need a "Flickr super pro" account... but that doesn't exist yet.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Guest</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 03:50:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: The Gray Family Upgrades from Flickr to SmugMug</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2008/07/gray-family-upgrades-from-flickr-to.html#comment-1047518</link><description>&lt;p&gt;ppmartin can I upload in RAW format to Flickr and retain the RAW format?  That was my deciding factor for smugmug, unless Flickr does that and I'm unaware.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jesse Stay</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 03:13:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: The Gray Family Upgrades from Flickr to SmugMug</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2008/07/gray-family-upgrades-from-flickr-to.html#comment-1047509</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I use both currently - I use Flickr for the social aspect, and SmugMug to archive the photos.  As SmugMug gets bigger I imagine I can probably use it for the social aspect as well.  &lt;a href="http://jessestay.smugmug.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://jessestay.smugmug.com"&gt;http://jessestay.smugmug.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jesse Stay</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 03:10:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: The Gray Family Upgrades from Flickr to SmugMug</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2008/07/gray-family-upgrades-from-flickr-to.html#comment-1046615</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Many thanks for the informative post, but ...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The pro account on Flickr cost less than $25/y, and most of my family and friends upgraded a long time ago.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;With the pro account, you have no limit in the number of pictures, high res, many levels of albums and sub-albums, great flexibility in terms of managing private / non private / for friends and family only, you can edit the pictures, either basic (rotation, for instance) or more complex via Picnik (connects easily with Flickr).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And you have a large community.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And I don't see how a service can remain free - and free of advertising - over the long term.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;So my pics will stay on Flickr for now ;)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;PS: I must admit that your albums on SmugMug do look good, though...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Guest</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 01:43:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: The Gray Family Upgrades from Flickr to SmugMug</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2008/07/gray-family-upgrades-from-flickr-to.html#comment-1045361</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Photos are about presentation, visual beauty, and SmugMug definitely wins in this category. I do like the album perspective you get vs. Flickr, where it seems like a dumping ground for photos. There really isn't any presentation capabilities.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I think each has its own place, and people will use what works for them. But I am very impressed with what I see at SumgMug.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Thom Allen</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 00:05:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: The Gray Family Upgrades from Flickr to SmugMug</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2008/07/gray-family-upgrades-from-flickr-to.html#comment-1045168</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I've been using Smugmug for a loooong time (before Leo Laporte started up with it, back when it was a competitor to PBase, which I'm not sure exists any longer).  I love the service but they have yet to convince me the price I pay per year is worth it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I actually converted from Smugmug to Flickr, myself, because Flickr has one huge thing Smugmug does not: integration into everything Web 2.0 + community.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Let me know what you think after a few months.  If you want a place to beautifully archive your personal photos, Smugmug's great.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;(Rebuilding mine right now, but: &lt;a href="http://photos.andydesoto.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://photos.andydesoto.com"&gt;http://photos.andydesoto.com&lt;/a&gt;.)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andy DeSoto</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 23:54:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: The Gray Family Upgrades from Flickr to SmugMug</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2008/07/gray-family-upgrades-from-flickr-to.html#comment-1044992</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I migrated to Smugmug when Yahoo insisted everyone HAD to have a yahoo email account to use Flickr. I love Smugmug and I and my extended family are all very happy campers for all the reasons you listed above.  I had paid accounts with both and Smugmug wins for me hands down.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://jdan57.smugmug.com/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://jdan57.smugmug.com/"&gt;http://jdan57.smugmug.com/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">J.D.</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 23:43:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: The Gray Family Upgrades from Flickr to SmugMug</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2008/07/gray-family-upgrades-from-flickr-to.html#comment-1044500</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Oh, I am such a sucker for babies. I looked at every picture. Such sweetness!  And those techie onesies are too cute!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Bring on the daddy blogging.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ballpoint Wren</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 23:11:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: The Gray Family Upgrades from Flickr to SmugMug</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2008/07/gray-family-upgrades-from-flickr-to.html#comment-1044330</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Looks really cool Louis.  I just bought Photoshop Elements for editing, and I use Flickr for sharing.  Not sure I'll make the jump, but it does sound interesting.  Good looking family shots too!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jnbammer</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 22:59:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: The Gray Family Upgrades from Flickr to SmugMug</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2008/07/gray-family-upgrades-from-flickr-to.html#comment-1044329</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Zoli, that's definitely why I called out the fact I was using the free version a few times in the update. Paid vs. Free usually wins, but I've heard a lot of good things, and so far, SmugMug is as advertised.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Louis Gray</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 22:59:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: The Gray Family Upgrades from Flickr to SmugMug</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2008/07/gray-family-upgrades-from-flickr-to.html#comment-1044264</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Louis,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I heard a lot of praise of Smugmug, so you've probably made the right choice, but let;s be real: since it's a for-pay site, you can't really compare it to a free Flickr account, only a Pro one.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Zoli Erdos</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 22:52:33 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>