-
Website
http://www.louisgray.com/live/ -
Original page
http://blog.louisgray.com/2008/12/best-solution-to-embargo-angst-write.html -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
charlieanzman
60 comments · 11 points
-
Jesse Stay
221 comments · 70 points
-
Ari Herzog
43 comments · 21 points
-
ChangeForge | Ken Stewart
133 comments · 18 points
-
drewolanoff
64 comments · 53 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
FTC Disclosures Made Simple For Bloggers With Conflicts
6 days ago · 46 comments
-
Still Waiting for An Evil Google? It's Not Going to Happen.
6 days ago · 30 comments
-
Fighting Bots With Bots on Twitter, Leveraging SocialToo
1 day ago · 5 comments
-
Simler Adds Likes, Favorite Tags, Revamps Homepage
1 day ago · 4 comments
-
Gowalla Raises $8.4 Million for Location Check-in Service
1 day ago · 2 comments
-
FTC Disclosures Made Simple For Bloggers With Conflicts
There is one interesting aspect I think worth discussing - you've said many times that LG.com isn't a blog looking to earn a living so to speak. This I think plays a role in some of the blogs you mentioned and why they cover certain stories perhaps.
In any case, it's good to see even more discussion about this. Although I would SO prefer to write about companies and working on my own freaking startup than deal with more drama.
intersection of being very popular, well read, and also offering
something unique. I don't think it is worth it to cover stories
everyone else is covering, like you say. (Of course, there is some
irony in that I wrote about this post and Steve Jobs pulling out of
Macworld, but I think readers can tell the difference)
LouisGray.com is not a pro blog. We have elements that are similar to
some pro blogs, but ads and revenue are not a target here. That's part
of why I see the world a bit differently than the post machines that
need to cover every story. I'm glad you're a little off-center as well.
There certainly is a fair amount of overlap in subscribership with early adopters and tech-heads, but by and large, there's a lot of differentiation in the audience. As someone who's seen the traffic numbers for this strategy, I can tell you that assessment is backed up by the rewarding traffic one gets by following the news that closely.
definitely have more insight here, regarding traffic. There is a
differentiation in the audiences, no doubt due to differentiation in
subject matter, tone and the authors. I just know that as a consumer
of tech news I didn't, for example, need 15 different stories on the
LinkedIn CEO change. Time could be better spent covering something
nobody else has.
can agree that it's annoying. Ultimately, I think it's an affliction
suffered by a minority.
OTOH, I think that this wouldn't be a bad thing if there were more
conversation between the majors. Something that annoyed me was the lack of
back and forth between them - there were obviously differences of opinion,
but petty politics prevents the naming of names of 'competitors,' too often.
Wayne
On the other hand, I often pick up the sources most commonly used by these large regurgitation blogs.
The biggest examples I can think of are Joystiq and Kotaku, both gaming blogs I used to read heavily but ultimately dropped both because it was the same stories I'd read elsewhere.
I think what is perhaps the most amazing is that we are in the midst of a seed change - that of the demise of millions of viewers visiting dozens of sites in favor of dozens of viewers visiting millions of sites. That is truly amazing!
true. There aren't "three major networks" from which to get your tech
news. I could easily go without TechCrunch, Mashable and ReadWriteWeb
if I were asked to. I would get plenty of good content from everywhere
else. But as there is competition for stories and placement among
social media sites, some are not playing by the same rules, which has
people up in arms around embargoes and other traditional rules of
respect and doing business.