<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>louisgray.com - Latest Comments in louisgray.com: New TAB Post: Why Not Integrate Safari With Finder?</title><link>http://louisgray.disqus.com/</link><description>A Silicon Valley Blog for Early Adopters and Tech Geeks</description><atom:link href="https://louisgray.disqus.com/louisgraycom_new_tab_post_why_not_integrate_safari_with_finder/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 20:26:00 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: New TAB Post: Why Not Integrate Safari With Finder?</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2007/06/new-tab-post-why-not-integrate-safari.html#comment-429217871</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Nice post - I read it over on the apple blog. Anyhoo, I'll politely disagree (as well) as although I use the Mac and love most things Apple, Safari is not one of them. I also feel that the jury is already out in that the Finder in Leopard is using the iTunes metaphor, with smart folders, several panels for drilling down into folders, QuickLook and cover flow.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think the bottom line for me is that web browsing is great for... web browsing, not so great for naviagating a hierarchy of folders and dealing with a huge amount of files in list view. Especially with this promise of cover flow and quicklook.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;At least, that's my 2 cents. Stick with the ideas though I like to read 'em!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Webomatica</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 20:26:00 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>