<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>louisgray.com - Latest Comments in louisgray.com: Is Technorati Going After Spam Blogs?</title><link>http://louisgray.disqus.com/</link><description>A Silicon Valley Blog for Early Adopters and Tech Geeks</description><atom:link href="https://louisgray.disqus.com/louisgraycom_is_technorati_going_after_spam_blogs/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 08:20:00 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: Is Technorati Going After Spam Blogs?</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2007/03/is-technorati-going-after-spam-blogs.html#comment-23873106</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I don't think that Technorati will do that because it will have a very big effect on the blogging community.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TAA</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 08:20:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: Is Technorati Going After Spam Blogs?</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2007/03/is-technorati-going-after-spam-blogs.html#comment-593494</link><description>&lt;p&gt;As for my pages, Technorati ranks #1 in spam-link-scams by jerks who want to increase their pings to generate Ad revenue. Bots create blogs all too easily, and I suspect a "real" person is by the comp only to fill in the captchka. Should we bring back the Guillotine? &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Antenna Wilde</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 17:04:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: Is Technorati Going After Spam Blogs?</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2007/03/is-technorati-going-after-spam-blogs.html#comment-429218102</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I know it's way late to be commenting on this post, but I'm hoping the turkeys at Technorati might read it. I'm gettin' pissed at these goody-two shoes linkhogs:Here's a letter I emailed to Technorati, which they will probably never read anyway: &lt;br&gt;Splog cleaning? I'm not trying to be a wise guy, but what the hell is wrong with you people? Regardless of what this URL tells you:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://technorati.com/blogs/dave-lucas.blogspot.com?reactions" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://technorati.com/blogs/dave-lucas.blogspot.com?reactions"&gt;http://technorati.com/blogs...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Technorati DOES have my blog which is NOT a spam blog and I am getting "Blog Reactions" while other sploggers, like &lt;a href="http://Revellian.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="Revellian.com"&gt;Revellian.com&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="http://mariuca.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="mariuca.blogspot.com"&gt;mariuca.blogspot.com&lt;/a&gt; push software guaranteed to boost and manipulate technorati rankings and social bookmarking links... it isn't fair and it cheapens your image, the same way including "MySpace" pages as "blogs" brought you down a peg:  here is the URL for the software scam:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://mariuca.blogspot.com/2007/07/my-technorati-train-ride.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://mariuca.blogspot.com/2007/07/my-technorati-train-ride.html"&gt;http://mariuca.blogspot.com...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave Lucas</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2007 13:37:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: Is Technorati Going After Spam Blogs?</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2007/03/is-technorati-going-after-spam-blogs.html#comment-429218104</link><description>&lt;p&gt;We have been doing a massive spam cleanup, as we discussed on the Technorati blog:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://technorati.com/weblog/2007/03/320.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://technorati.com/weblog/2007/03/320.html"&gt;http://technorati.com/weblo...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks for noticing! I hope that you've seen a difference...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Dave&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 09:31:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: Is Technorati Going After Spam Blogs?</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2007/03/is-technorati-going-after-spam-blogs.html#comment-429218105</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The number of blogs cited in t'rati's stats is for a window of time (6 months?). As time progresses, if you don't add new blogs at the rate you drop them (as the window slides), your count will go down.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Matthew Hurst</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2007 06:36:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: Is Technorati Going After Spam Blogs?</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2007/03/is-technorati-going-after-spam-blogs.html#comment-429218106</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Google's Adsense would be the #1 purpose for spamblogs. If you're paid pennies per view, and you can attract a high number of views for content that isn't yours, it's a great ROI. The more spam blogs and ads you create, the more money you would make.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Alternatively, you could have a secondary, partially legitimate, revenue-creating business that you could advertise on the spam blogs and make money there.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But... I'm no expert at it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">louisgray</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2007 01:55:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: Is Technorati Going After Spam Blogs?</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2007/03/is-technorati-going-after-spam-blogs.html#comment-429218107</link><description>&lt;p&gt;At the risk of sounding ignorant, what's the benefit of creating a spam blog?  Is it to create marketing for something?  Lure in users to see ads?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Gal Josefsberg</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2007 01:42:00 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>