<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>louisgray.com - Latest Comments in Is Lifestreaming a Catalyst for What's Coming After Web 2.0?</title><link>http://louisgray.disqus.com/</link><description>A Silicon Valley Blog for Early Adopters and Tech Geeks</description><atom:link href="https://louisgray.disqus.com/louisgraycom_is_lifestreaming_a_catalyst_for_whats_coming_after_web_20/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 01:23:46 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Is Lifestreaming a Catalyst for What's Coming After Web 2.0?</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2008/10/is-lifestreaming-catalyst-for-whats.html#comment-7053607</link><description>&lt;p&gt;very cool post. i see intelligence from the stream. recommendations, predictive models, so many possibilities. will make a movie like pi very real.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Michael J Lambie</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 01:23:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Lifestreaming a Catalyst for What's Coming After Web 2.0?</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2008/10/is-lifestreaming-catalyst-for-whats.html#comment-4330776</link><description>&lt;p&gt;good post, I like the term "financestream"...you don't have Facebook Connect intergrated yet (what gives"?!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 13:09:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Lifestreaming a Catalyst for What's Coming After Web 2.0?</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2008/10/is-lifestreaming-catalyst-for-whats.html#comment-3285741</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Web2 is all around Social Media &lt;br&gt;The "next" Web will be around of Personal Media and Lifestreaming is one of the major components...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Stefanos Karagos</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 18:24:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Lifestreaming a Catalyst for What's Coming After Web 2.0?</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2008/10/is-lifestreaming-catalyst-for-whats.html#comment-3225952</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;The next phase will be creating intelligence based on the data. The first step to that will be recommendation engines.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Absolutely. Creating intelligence (with which users can interact) is what we do now, and requests for a recommendation engine are something we get regularly (and are working on).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I think, though, that better analysis of and interaction with our data is just an early step, and one that's still very "machine-based". A fundamental part of lifestreaming is that it's our &lt;em&gt;lives&lt;/em&gt;, and we're not machines. Even with hard data, once you get into the recommendation side of things, it gets less binary and more human, and humans are messy and unpredictable sometimes.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Slicing and dicing data in particular ways isn't going to be a one size fits all answer. Especially when we get into the parts of lifestreaming that deal with relationships. A need for relationship management online is already something increasingly needed, and filled with all the subtleties and minefields of human interaction (combined with trickiness like invisibility and relationships for which English has no accurate descriptive terms).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;There currently aren't really intelligent tools to manage relationship-centered data well like there are to manage financial data, RSS feeds, photos, etc., and I think it's something we're going to have to sort out, though not without a few stops, starts, and re-directs, I'm sure (see early comment about humans being messy and unpredictable...).&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Melanie Baker</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 09:22:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Lifestreaming a Catalyst for What's Coming After Web 2.0?</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2008/10/is-lifestreaming-catalyst-for-whats.html#comment-3211068</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Your thoughtful article really made me start thinking about what  Web 3.0 may someday be like, Louis. I really enjoyed this article!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JDEbberly</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 17:12:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Lifestreaming a Catalyst for What's Coming After Web 2.0?</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2008/10/is-lifestreaming-catalyst-for-whats.html#comment-3205412</link><description>&lt;p&gt;@Mark I tend to agree with you; Web 1.0 let users generate content, Web 2.0 brought us the RSS feeds, and REST APIs to use that content outside the sites where it was made, and Web 3.0 will arrive when we figure out how to make that data do something useful for us. Until recently Lifestreaming has been a relatively simple matter of aggregating a person's feeds, but there's potential to do so much more. By accumulating these feeds of data we are actually semantically organizing them. We are saying; all this data relates to a person. As I build my application &lt;a href="http://www.agglodex.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.agglodex.com"&gt;http://www.agglodex.com&lt;/a&gt; it's my goal to do something other than aggregate and republish all your content. The stuff you make online can tell us what you're interested in (aka attention data) and that's at the heart of any recommendation system. I can't wait to see how people apply the techniques we Lifestreamers are employing to other sets of data. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jesse Hattabaugh</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 13:54:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Lifestreaming a Catalyst for What's Coming After Web 2.0?</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2008/10/is-lifestreaming-catalyst-for-whats.html#comment-3198687</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think Lifestreaming is the lead off for a type of total immersion  between life and web for the coming generation of semantic technology.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;JMO, Peace&lt;br&gt;Mich D&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MichDdot</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 03:58:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Lifestreaming a Catalyst for What's Coming After Web 2.0?</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2008/10/is-lifestreaming-catalyst-for-whats.html#comment-3178616</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Great post.   I agree that lifestreaming and financial management sites have a lot in common and are a means to an end for personalization and recommendation.  I often talk about the similarity when people ask us what the connection is between the various products and services we have at Strands (e.g. &lt;a href="http://Strands.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="Strands.com"&gt;Strands.com&lt;/a&gt; and the soon-to-be launched moneyStrands).  They both aggregate data from multiple (personal) sources, identify patterns and ultimately make personalized recommendations based on a user's implicit and explicit input.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">J Herskowitz</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 19:35:24 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>