-
Website
http://www.louisgray.com/live/ -
Original page
http://blog.louisgray.com/2008/11/introducing-exchange-rates-for-blog.html -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
charlieanzman
60 comments · 11 points
-
Jesse Stay
221 comments · 70 points
-
Ari Herzog
43 comments · 21 points
-
ChangeForge | Ken Stewart
133 comments · 18 points
-
drewolanoff
64 comments · 53 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
FTC Disclosures Made Simple For Bloggers With Conflicts
6 days ago · 46 comments
-
Still Waiting for An Evil Google? It's Not Going to Happen.
6 days ago · 30 comments
-
Fighting Bots With Bots on Twitter, Leveraging SocialToo
1 day ago · 5 comments
-
Simler Adds Likes, Favorite Tags, Revamps Homepage
1 day ago · 4 comments
-
Gowalla Raises $8.4 Million for Location Check-in Service
1 day ago · 2 comments
-
FTC Disclosures Made Simple For Bloggers With Conflicts
Don't assume those hundreds or thousands of people would have read your post and commented on it had it not been shared to begin with.
this market has been tried and failed in the Web 1.0 timeframe.
Remember Flooz or Beenz and all those silly "fake money" companies in
the late 90s? The second I start implementing real exchange rates, CN
is bound to hit rock bottom, and I want to avoid that to preserve
Allen's reputation.
As for exchanging 10 likes on FriendFeed for a single blog comment, I
often will go through my FriendFeed lists and make likes because I
know it expands the exposure of people who wouldn't otherwise be seen.
It's interesting after a particularly active run to go back into my
own discussion list and see the additional likes and comments that
have surfaced in the wake. Often, I'd bet folks go back to the
original site and participate. FriendFeed is among my top referrals
every day, trailing only Google much of the time.
In a worst case scenario, someone reads my content in google reader, then goes to comment on it on ff. As I've said before, FF is nothing more than a conversation stealer. And now you have this crop of new conversation stealers like Shiftyr, SocialMedian, etc.
I've written enough about this topic before. I know it's impossible for the Gray/Scoble camp to see - no worries. It is interesting to watch Scoble run around town pushing FF links - he just did it last night on TC.
I wonder if he has a CB radio setup - "scoble we have a 10-92 at Mashable, respond urgently". 10-92 = blog post with commentary on FF but no link to the commentary... FF hq dispatches Scoble to take care of the situation - in fact that might just make a funny video :)
Thanks for bringing back the original CN green logo - aah the old days :)
For my small blog the conversations on FriendFeed are usually much busier and more rewarding than the conversation on my own site. I'm sure this is frustrating for someone who blogs for a living but in my case I'm just happy to see the conversations sprout.
I am pretty sure that the 5-10 FriendFeed comments I get on a given post are comments that just wouldn't have happened because most people wouldn't bother going to my site.
Rather than worry about great news discovery sites like hacker news or friendfeed "stealing" conversation, I'm going to welcome the increased audience and spend time trying to figure out how to thread these separate conversations together.
We've already got the great FriendFeed comments plugin available for WordPress and I include that on my template for a bit of cross-pollination. ReadWriteWeb does it as well!
I understand that the "just scrape the comments into your site" solution isn't always viable and certainly won't scale beyond two or three scrapers but in the end these new conversations are something to be valued.
Please don't turn into the Jack Valenti of blog comments!
I know your concerns have quite a bit of merit. There's a certain
level of effort and investment needed to engage with blog authors to
enable conversations, and the best way to do that today is through
comments. I did present it in a fun tone, but I'm glad you see the
chart as being close to reality, with some exchange rates to be moved
up or down of course.
I wouldn't say it's "impossible" for the Gray/Scoble camp to see your
comments on these new sites being conversation "stealers", as you can
see from the post, I'm listening, and I know Robert (though there is
no Gray/Scoble camp) sees your comments too. But where we differ is
that I do recognize the change and I don't think you can proverbially
unring that bell. The conversations are taking place in more diverse
places, and I think it behooves the blog owner to be aware and
participate.
Thanks for letting me use the logo, and I give you 1 CN point for your
well thought out comment here this morning.
I will have more on this later - when I say "gray/scoble" camp - it's because I think both of you are on the same side of the issue... it's ok, I will win you over, don't worry.
Jeff Tippett
jefftippett.com
So, long story short, your philosophical system doesn't weight comments by who makes them, yet that would make a huge difference. In the meantime, certainly some of the "great post" comments are made by people hoping to be seen. I'll make this one unclaimed to prove there's no agenda.
(What the CN for this?)
Anyway, joke aside, I like this chart, would be nice to have a service that keep track CN ratings.