DISQUS

louisgray.com: louisgray.com: How One Would-be Web Friend Turned Into a Stalker In Months

  • Gordon Swaby · 1 year ago
    Ok that's down right SCARY. It's like this person was on a round-a-bout, first it's over then it's on again like a couple facing serious relationship problems. This message alone creeped me out "Together we would be stronger."

    I think it took you too long to tell that person you were not interested, you should have been frank and say something like 'Please do not contact me anymore, i do not feel comfortable with you contacting me and i am certainly not interested in your venture". Maybe then the "stalking" would have stopped
  • Rahsheen · 1 year ago
    Sometimes, the nicest thing you can do is be mean. I have dealt with some really messed up people before and they're emotional vocabulary is usually pretty limited.

    You can still be the nice guy without putting up with crap like this. Cut em off and go about business as usual.

    I would hate to see incidents like this affect yours or anyones engagement and accessibility in the community.
  • Jesse Stay · 1 year ago
    This guy almost sounds like a scammer - perhaps he's trying to get you to agree to something so he can take you further to the deal and get your money? It almost seems bot-like. I suggest just ignoring him - mark his e-mails as spam, filter them to the trash, and do all you can to get anything about him out of your social and communications streams so you're not tempted to respond again.

    If it gets too bad you could always contact a lawyer - doesn't quite seem threatening ATM though.
  • Louis Gray · 1 year ago
    I don't find it as threatening. Just annoying to the point where I don't trust most inbound phone calls to the cell (and always check caller ID). There's something ridiculous about racing in from one room where I'm changing the baby to find the phone ringing next to the other one, who is sleeping, only to find out it's this guy. So frustrating.

    And no, I doubt it'll get legal at any point. He'll see this and won't be happy with me, but that should be it. We'll see.
  • Jesse Stay · 1 year ago
    You should get a GrandCentral number - then you can send all of this guy's
    calls straight to voicemail or thin air. For my public number (801)
    853-8339 I use GrandCentral so I can route my calls in this way. Let me
    know if you need an invite. It's a shame that you even have to think about
    this though - just a few people tend to ruin it for everyone else.
  • mjc · 1 year ago
    I thought GC wasn't handing out invites anymore :(
  • Jesse Stay · 1 year ago
    Hmmm...That's odd - not seeing the invite option any more. Does this mean
    they're not growing any more? Wondering if I need to switch services.
  • mjc · 1 year ago
    I thought GC wasn't handing out invites anymore :(
  • LaTtEX · 1 year ago
    Why do I have a feeling that this person has MPD? Thinking, at one point, that s/he is one person, and then becoming another person at another point?
  • Louis Gray · 1 year ago
    That's part of what's so bizarre. It's one thing that they are aggressively interested. Fine, I get that, even if it's annoying. But the back and forth weird emotional roller coaster they're on makes no sense.
  • Mark 'Rizzn' Hopkins · 1 year ago
    I've had some PR folks who acted similarly before. After it becomes clear they're nuts, I block them in every way possible.
  • Louis Gray · 1 year ago
    I can see PR being aggressive. In my real-world role, at times, I know I've called reporters or customers frequently, but we try to use "best practices" and establish a relationship instead. There are just some PR folks, whom I'm sure you've dealt with, who are inexperienced, and think the stalking is aggressive and shows tenacity.
  • Mark 'Rizzn' Hopkins · 1 year ago
    Yeah, there was one I've mentioned before at my blog that for several days was calling me on average 12 times a day. I wound up setting Grand Central to route her calls directly to voicemail. Thankfully that's not the norm, and almost all PR people I deal with are very cordial and a pleasure to deal with.
  • JC · 1 year ago
    Wow. Just... wow. I'm speechless.

    Not sure if it's already out there, but someone really should create an etiquette document about communication and "friending" behavior online... for those that don't have the common sense to know what's appropriate and what's not. Then again, the target audience still probably wouldn't adhere to the etiquette guidelines.
  • Louis Gray · 1 year ago
    I think guidelines won't work with this person or others like them, where they believe they are on the right side of social give and take. I'm sure this person has a different perspective, whether it's a commonly-held one or not.
  • secretsushi · 1 year ago
    Louis,
    Thank your for sharing this. My input is that you seemed to have replied too often and too politely when you could clearly see that this individuals behavior went well past the normal pattern of communication.

    "Hire slow, fire fast" was a quote I heard some time ago. Friends on the web are one thing, but this conversation started taking a deeper turn into working and collaborating together.
  • Metz · 1 year ago
    @LAttex Sounds more like BPD to me, but I'm no doc. Glad Louis has wrapped this one up. Yuck.
  • Ross McKillop · 1 year ago
    I've never run into it, but I know how I'd get out of it. It involves the F word. Repeatedly. Before, and followed by, phrases like "go away" "leave me alone" "stop it" "you're scary" "you've hit level 10 on my creep-o-meter" and "I already have one wife" (that last one was a joke ladies, you're all aces in my book).

    You tried the polite route. Kudos. I would have been just as nice at first too. But when it hits that level of stalkerdom, it's time to cut to the chase and spell things out painfully clearly.
  • Louis Gray · 1 year ago
    Looking at the Sent messages in Facebook, I can see where even in my saying "no" I was too polite. Part of my concern in being visible is that somebody I've "wronged" could post my own e-mails and expose me as a jerk or someone who curses or some other nonsense. So I often write expecting that someone else I didn't anticipate to see the message will see it.
  • DianaValerini · 1 year ago
    Don't you think it is some kind of new age bot ?
  • Tgray · 1 year ago
    That's exactly what I was thinking! a type of automated response that keyed off a previous message... maybe someone's psychology class experiment!
  • GeekMommy · 1 year ago
    Actually I have run into this sort of person on the internet before. The only thing that worked for me was saying "you know, it's not you, it's me - I just can't handle the level of our interaction. I think you'd be much happier working with someone else. Good Luck and thanks for everything, but I really think this is for the best." and then completely ignoring them. Eventually in *most* cases, they find someone else to fixate on.

    Then again, there is one woman who has been stalking me online for over 3 yrs now.
  • svartling · 1 year ago
    Unbelievable.....
  • micahwittman · 1 year ago
    Thanks for sharing this personal/public ordeal. It's a signpost that others on the road you travel would be wise to take notice of and contemplate. I can't offer any experienced-based advice for this level of disturbing attention, but I will share an awkward online social interaction and the non-event (a good thing) ending. On an unspecified social network, I "unfollowed" (a twitter term, but used in an generic sense) someone whom I had "followed" for a short period of time (I always think of it as a trial basis).

    When they noticed I had disengaged, I got a directed message to the effect of "what's up with whole leaving thing?". I was actually thinking clearly that day and gave one reply that was to be my final response no matter what reaction it was going to get (that was my resolve). As concisely as possible, I stated matter-of-factly that I adjust my inbound and outbound flow of communication through these social network technologies to try and get the right data type and quantity. To that I added, admitted, that there was specific behaviour that had trigged my choice to disengage (there was slightly more detail, but not necessary here).

    So, to recap: I conveyed that disengaging 1) aligned with an internal guideline that was reasoned, and 2) I tried to be honest by being clear that their specific action resulted in my specific reaction - so in other words, SHOW RESPECT by facing the concrete issue(s); people want to be heard and respected - they can often deal with being disqualified from X if handled respectfully, and in manner neither too terse nor too drawn out. The response was 'no response' (success!), which meant no flame war, and the issue was resolved (as far as I know).

    Again, the whole thing wasn't a big deal, and remained at the level of 'socially strained' and 'a curiosity', but I guess that's the point.
  • JoMangee · 1 year ago
    I suppose it could happen to any of us - putting enough of our lives out there, that is doesn't take much for a nut to glean sufficient information to be an effective stalker, and an annoyance. With no physical connection, and lack of real life communication, normal social pressure and hints don't work without a two-way relationship and effective communication - and it helps it the other person can actually communicate.

    Can't see you could do anything better,
  • Jemm · 1 year ago
    Indeed creepy guy :o

    I hope someday there will be some common profiles/identities across all services where it would be possible to block some individuals once and for all. Of course, people obsessed enough would find their ways around them, anyway.
  • Pat Phelan · 1 year ago
    Louis
    This happened to me last year
    I didn't give someone the attention they felt they deserved and they made my (and my company) life a misery. I think there is no right or wrong way to deal with this owing to the fact that you cannot be dealing with a sensible person.
    In my case I had to acknowledge the person (and their encyclopaedic knowledge of the mobile industry despite having never worked in it) and they eventually went away. Hope it sorts itself out and you can get back to normality.
  • awilensky · 1 year ago
    Louis:

    Forget that guy, why won't you work with ME ME ME? huh? ME?

    Seriously, if the problem continues, maybe a few of us will need to give him an in-person, Silicon Valley, lead-pipe pitch. If you know what I mean.
  • idnan · 1 year ago
    Angered the Borg, have we?

    In any event, thanks for sharing this disturbing experience; it can't have been the easiest thing to do. I've certainly never had to block anyone, but my impression is of a very immature person. Where you see immaturity, treat it as such. Personally, I'd make one clear communication that x behavior is unwanted for y reason, and the consequences of its continuation will be z. There is no further need of communication after that; simply enforce the consequences you specified, be that blocking, reposts of abuse to site owners, ... or whatever one does.

    I think you've handled yourself admirably, and had far more patience than I would have done.
  • MarinaMartin · 1 year ago
    Wow, Louis. With all due respect ... quit being such a nice guy! Their oddness aside, you wasted your own valuable time to deal with someone who didn't deserve it.

    If someone starts out that awkward in an online discourse with you, odds are they are equally (if not moreso) awkward with everyone else, and not someone you want to be associated with, even loosely. I know you need to be careful about what you write because it can be make public later, but ignoring them after a polite goodbye may be the best call in future cases - they can't very well make your non-existent emails public. (They could make up emails, but that risk is there regardless.)

    Can you filter their number to go straight to voicemail, or give a disconnected notice when they call, or at least change the ringtone (to silent) when they call? Now might be a good time to get a new phone number and start with a new phone number policy. I give out my GrandCentral number partially because it allows people to reach me when I'm out of the country (by forwarding to my # there without me having to pay $2/hr) and partially so I can filter who has access to me and when.

    Glad you posted this, though, because you got the first word in just in case they were planning some sor of smear attack.
  • Mia · 1 year ago
    ...very disturbing. Just goes to show there are crazies everywhere, online is no different than the offline world.
  • JamieEi · 1 year ago
    Ouch, this guy sounds one step away from boiling your pet bunny. IMO you are being way too casual about this. You have no idea how nuts this guy is. If he contacts you again I'd seriously consider going to the cops.
  • IdoNotes · 1 year ago
    Send to spam, blacklist and block calls. Poof :-) Hence the reason you need GrandCentral (or similar) for phone routing and connection via the web.
  • dan · 1 year ago
    Oh that is just too bizzare, kinda scary too.
  • charlieperry · 1 year ago
    Ian McEwan's Enduring Love comes to mind. Scary book.
  • mdoeff · 1 year ago
    I'm going to repeat JC's comment...
    Wow. Just... wow.
  • David Cook · 1 year ago
    The price of being internet famous....? I guess....?
  • Liz · 1 year ago
    IF this guy had an actual startup (which may or may not be the case) part of his pitch might have implied you were going to be part of this venture. Hence, his going back & forth between desperately wanting you to join the project and acceptance that you had no interest. He might have been putting out fires (promises made) that affected his yo-yoing reaction to you.

    It's impossible to know what motivated him, I'm just encouraging you to consider that might have been less an obsession with you and more that it is connected with external factors in his life. I hope this puts an end to the unwanted communication.
  • Louis Gray · 1 year ago
    Liz, I think you're absolutely right, and I know that I wasn't the only person being pursued by this individual. I believe if he went to raise capital and promised that I or the second person being pursued were on board he thinks he would have a better story. But even on its face, the proposed business didn't make sense.
  • merriam · 1 year ago
    That's enough trying to hide his identity. Presumably it's Alex Hammer, and he's still at it here in your comments. Jason Calacanis flagged him over a year ago.

    http://www.calacanis.com/2007/07/03/anyone-else...

    "I've got some very strange dude emailing me over and over again with long lists of "friends on Facebook." ... I've heard from three or four notable people that he is a stalker."
  • banane · 1 year ago
    Ugh, and double-ugh. These people ruin it for the rest of us! I hope you don't stop your open and friendly manner, Louis! I had this happen in various groups I've participated in. Something about being friendly and outgoing, and people flock to you, and usually it's the desperate and needy. I ran to the bathroom to escape one woman the other day at a Board Meeting, no lie. My brother gets the same treatment sometime (we're so popular!) and gave me a tip, of total non-communication, which it seems you picked up on after this whole episode. I do hope you remain your usual outgoing self, I do appreciate it! Also makes me think that these sites need better blocking/filtering methods for "friendships".
  • Ken R. · 1 year ago
    Louis--Yes, this seems easily over the line of creepy. Perhaps you might share a future post sometime on the challenge--ever present, but more applicable to the logistics and aesthetics of successful bloggers--of how to be simultaneously transparent and careful. That said, I hope you rarely have the occasion to think about the challenge again....
  • Jeremiah Owyang · 1 year ago
    Time is money :)
  • Alex Hammer · 1 year ago
    Louis, thanks for the interview: http://www.louisgray.com/live/2008/05/alex-hamm...
  • Alex Hammer · 1 year ago
    Not that you need it but you have my permission to identify that that is me (to which this post refers). Suffice to say that there are two sides (or more) to every story, and I'm not going to get into that ditch.

    Best wishes.
  • Alex Hammer · 1 year ago
    My two comments below on your site to your post. Best wishes, Alex
    Alex Hammer 8 minutes ago 1 point
    Louis, thanks for the interview: http://www.louisgray.com/live/2008/05/alex-hamm...
    Alex Hammer 5 seconds ago 1 point
    Not that you need it but you have my permission to identify that that is me (to which this post refers). Suffice to say that there are two sides (or more) to every story, and I'm not going to get into that ditch.
  • korf420 · 1 year ago
    yikes dude! some real trippers out there. cool of you to share this with wider audience though - would be fun if ira glass picked up on this thread for a this american life episode (http://www.thislife.org)... and actually got the other guys POV too - why not? like not let this one slink off like a wounded skunk - but embrace and learn from it for everyone who is being open like you've so graciously been - but also this ambitious fellow who stepped over the often too "gray" line....
  • Roger Kondrat · 1 year ago
    Louis, I only just now finally got through this post it was that important to me personally and I apologise now that I can't read the comments and see if someone else has said this but here it is for better or worse :)

    I think this is sad clearly this person is off their crackerjack and needs some therapy. I think you have a duty though to report them as their behaviour may develop as time progresses and become more than just scary.

    Also in the broader scheme it really is like all things in life though you take the good with the bad and thankfully most times its more good than bad by far and I think it is important to remember that right as this bad taste in your mouth could lead to changes in your behaviour like being guarded etc. Obviously those choices are personal but I just wanted to remind you of well basically what I think you already know in that sense.

    Lastly I think its worth pointing out that in your last couple paragraphs you became a victim in my eyes by your tone and attitude.

    "I made a few mistakes in this process. First, I was open to talking, being friendly with a person who I barely knew. The world of online social networks makes this commonplace. Later, feeling bad for ignoring all their messages, and wanting to not sound like a jerk, I had offered to help on a side-project, when I should have just blocked them outright on Facebook."

    What you are doing now is finding your role in their mistakes but you don't have a role. I have been ignored in my life, I have had people not reply in 24hrs and much more additionally I have been on your end handing out the 'im busy' responses and never had a problem. Their behaviour is not normal and is entirely separate from you.

    Anyway I would charge them with harassment because I would want a restraining order not because it works but that way I could discover who they are and where they live.

    Hope you bounce back and move forward in a positive way.

    All the best your FF Friend Roger ;)
  • Susan Mernit · 1 year ago
    Great post! Truly scary how transparency can bring great connections...and unbalanced trolls.
  • kylelacy · 1 year ago
    That is creppy
  • Mademoiselle_B · 1 year ago
    Wow. Total nutcase..

    I've had to deal with a few 'stalkers' and the best way, the only way to deal with them effectively in order for them to go away, is to completely ignore them. Not give them any attention, reaction or impression that you have even read what they've sent. Because otherwise -- they will continue to send messages, hoping and waiting for the one you will react and respond to.. And then they've got what they wanted. My suggestion: block him on all social network sites, set up a filter in gmail so that his emails don't even make it to your inbox and go straight to trash, have your phone company block his calls and if somehow he gets through, say, by using a different email account, DO NOT respond and set up another filter to trash any mail from him. But no matter what you do, the most important thing is that from now on, you do not ever respond to or acknowledge any of his messages or attempts to contact you. None. Because as soon as you do, you're back to square one, as you've given him exactly what he wants so he's going to keep up the same behavior in order to get it again.... because he knows he can and he knows eventually it will work and you will give him attention and/or respond to him and his messages.

    For real, that is the ONLY way to get rid of a stalker or obsessive person.


    Good luck.