http://louisgray.disqus.com/A Silicon Valley Blog for Early Adopters and Tech GeeksenTue, 28 Oct 2008 03:13:11 -0000http://blog.louisgray.com/2008/10/google-reader-unveils-individual-rss.html#comment-3339037<p>Atul, yes, Google Reader updated the overall trends page as well. <br>Interestingly, it only shows the # of items posted for the feeds you <br>currently have, and the # of reads you actually did. This, to me, <br>means that I read more posts than are available, as I recently cut one <br>or two busy feeds. Still, it seems odd to show I read greater than <br>100% of the available items...</p>Louis GrayTue, 28 Oct 2008 03:13:11 -0000http://blog.louisgray.com/2008/10/google-reader-unveils-individual-rss.html#comment-3339002<p>The overall trends page appears to be updated as well (<a href="http://www.google.com/reader/view/#trends-page)" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.google.com/reader/view/#trends-page)">http://www.google.com/reade...</a>. It shows "items posted" as well as "items read". Previously it used to graph the "items read" only.</p>atulTue, 28 Oct 2008 03:08:08 -0000http://blog.louisgray.com/2008/10/google-reader-unveils-individual-rss.html#comment-3335866<p>Andy, I did see the Scobleizer statistics were low. Google Reader reports a few different feeds for Robert, with differing subscriber counts:</p><p>Scobleizer — Tech geek blogger: 17,392 subscribers<br>Scobleizer: Microsoft Geek Blogger: 3,345 subscribers</p><p>For some reason, the one I have says 328. I assume the aggregate is north of 20,000.</p>Louis GrayMon, 27 Oct 2008 22:25:54 -0000http://blog.louisgray.com/2008/10/google-reader-unveils-individual-rss.html#comment-3334980<p>Did you look at the number of subscribers listed for Robert? There are a couple of zeros missing</p>AndyBeardMon, 27 Oct 2008 21:16:49 -0000