http://louisgray.disqus.com/A Silicon Valley Blog for Early Adopters and Tech GeeksenSun, 07 Oct 2007 17:56:00 -0000http://blog.louisgray.com/2007/10/google-reader-chokes-on-scoble-shared.html#comment-429217588<p>I've been subscribed to his shared items for several months using google reader and never had a problem.</p>AnonymousSun, 07 Oct 2007 17:56:00 -0000http://blog.louisgray.com/2007/10/google-reader-chokes-on-scoble-shared.html#comment-429217589<p>It looks like Google has brought <b><a href="http://assetbar.wordpress.com/2007/09/11/google-reader-using-squid/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://assetbar.wordpress.com/2007/09/11/google-reader-using-squid/">back</a></b> the squid proxy cache.<br><br>While in general, cache invalidation is tricky and can lead to the errors you've pointed out, Squid is a <i>particularly </i> old architecture and poor choice of cache to use. It shocks me that they snuck squid by the smart guys on Google's tech team.<br><br>With squid in the mix, they'll be taking it at both ends for a while. <br><br>A lot of people will say "It works for me." <br>And it will. <br>Until it doesn't. <br>Thanks for the screen cap to prove you're not crazy. <br><br>(Of course, our release will have plenty of our own fails. At least I'll blame those on going to Oktoberfest in Munich instead of a chump cache server.)</p>Israel L'HeureuxSun, 07 Oct 2007 12:42:00 -0000