<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>louisgray.com - Latest Comments in louisgray.com: Google FeedFetcher and FeedBurner Miss Each Other Again</title><link>http://louisgray.disqus.com/</link><description>A Silicon Valley Blog for Early Adopters and Tech Geeks</description><atom:link href="https://louisgray.disqus.com/louisgraycom_google_feedfetcher_and_feedburner_miss_each_other_again/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 04:13:00 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: Google FeedFetcher and FeedBurner Miss Each Other Again</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2008/02/google-feedfetcher-and-feedburner-miss.html#comment-429216675</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Louis &amp;amp; Co, thanks for the great posts on the RSS world.  This is somewhat off-topic for this post, but I was wondering if anyone has found an RSS ranking/aggregation service or Reader that is able to deliver really relevant content ranked in a way that  you like.  I've tried all of the services that you have discussed on this blog over the last few months, but they all add to my information overload rather than reduce it.  What I'd like is a service that ranks my 200+ blog, news, and delicious feeds by tag(topic) as well as by by importance.  Importance means importance inside that topic.  I don't want generally popular postings, because those tend to have little to do with what I'm interested in.  I only want those deemed valuable to "in the know" specialists in the particular topic.  For instance, I'd like the daily top 10 postings that other Rails developers thought were important. AideRSS seems to have that general idea in mind, but when I load them up with my link blog they break.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Has anyone seen a service like that?  Does anyone else feel like they want a similar service?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Logan Henriquez</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 04:13:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: Google FeedFetcher and FeedBurner Miss Each Other Again</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2008/02/google-feedfetcher-and-feedburner-miss.html#comment-429216676</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I experienced the same exact thing.  I always see it as a system hiccup vs. a "problem" because FB always comes through in the end.  I think the fact that the service does have these interruptions is excusable because it is free - although the paid accounts had the same troubles.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Eric Friedman</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 20:24:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: Google FeedFetcher and FeedBurner Miss Each Other Again</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2008/02/google-feedfetcher-and-feedburner-miss.html#comment-429216678</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I figured something was up with the service when I saw over a 100+ subscribers go missing from the counter.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steven Hodson</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 20:08:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: Google FeedFetcher and FeedBurner Miss Each Other Again</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2008/02/google-feedfetcher-and-feedburner-miss.html#comment-429216679</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I don't publish my readership, however, I found it strange that my readership declined significantly.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Any idea on when this will be fixed?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chris R</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 19:49:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: Google FeedFetcher and FeedBurner Miss Each Other Again</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2008/02/google-feedfetcher-and-feedburner-miss.html#comment-429216681</link><description>&lt;p&gt;ha ha yeah i thought my lack of posting had driven the masses away...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MG Siegler</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 18:52:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: Google FeedFetcher and FeedBurner Miss Each Other Again</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2008/02/google-feedfetcher-and-feedburner-miss.html#comment-429216683</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Up, down... mine are down. Have reached the point where the number is increasingly irrelevant.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Webomatica</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 17:18:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: Google FeedFetcher and FeedBurner Miss Each Other Again</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2008/02/google-feedfetcher-and-feedburner-miss.html#comment-429216687</link><description>&lt;p&gt;My feed stats are showing just the opposite - my subscribers appear to have doubled overnight.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nick Bradbury</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 16:27:00 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>