<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>louisgray.com - Latest Comments in louisgray.com: Disqus' Partner Strategy: Is FriendFeed Integration Up Next?</title><link>http://louisgray.disqus.com/</link><description>A Silicon Valley Blog for Early Adopters and Tech Geeks</description><atom:link href="https://louisgray.disqus.com/louisgraycom_disqus_partner_strategy_is_friendfeed_integration_up_next/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 04:54:16 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: Disqus' Partner Strategy: Is FriendFeed Integration Up Next?</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2008/05/disqus-partner-strategy-is-friendfeed.html#comment-22975188</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think it would be awesome if Disqus can integrate with FriendFeed&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Free Games</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 04:54:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: Disqus' Partner Strategy: Is FriendFeed Integration Up Next?</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2008/05/disqus-partner-strategy-is-friendfeed.html#comment-962618</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That would be a great thing if the two were combined. I guess it really doesn't matter where to comments are, as long as the discussion is ongoing.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Curtis </dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 22:42:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: Disqus' Partner Strategy: Is FriendFeed Integration Up Next?</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2008/05/disqus-partner-strategy-is-friendfeed.html#comment-616808</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Well I've disclosed my investment in disqus on every post I've ever done on&lt;br&gt;my blog.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I think people know where I am coming from&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And plus, I tried a bunch of things and then went with disqus on my own blog&lt;br&gt;a long time before I invested in disqus (at least six months before I&lt;br&gt;invested in disqus)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;So my opinion is also based on my experiences as a blogger&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I really do think that disqus is the best starting point&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;fred&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fredwilson</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Jun 2008 06:31:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: Disqus' Partner Strategy: Is FriendFeed Integration Up Next?</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2008/05/disqus-partner-strategy-is-friendfeed.html#comment-616493</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Fred,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Given that you have invested money into Disqus your&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;"disqus is probably the best starting point"&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;comment is self serving.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In future, before you sell the community on your opinions please disclose&lt;br&gt;your financial relationships.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I am with JS-Kit.  We provide Comment, Polls, &amp;amp; Ratings widgets for over&lt;br&gt;65,000+ blogs worldwide.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Be Well,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Khris, CEO &lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://js-kit.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://js-kit.com"&gt;http://js-kit.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Khris</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Jun 2008 01:54:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: Disqus' Partner Strategy: Is FriendFeed Integration Up Next?</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2008/05/disqus-partner-strategy-is-friendfeed.html#comment-555786</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That's the beginning.  From their partnership comes the other players joining in.  We are not excluding anyone here.  ^_^&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Yohan Yukiya 사요한 謝雪矢</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 06:14:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: Disqus' Partner Strategy: Is FriendFeed Integration Up Next?</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2008/05/disqus-partner-strategy-is-friendfeed.html#comment-555238</link><description>&lt;p&gt;What else could we ask for?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;For starters, how about something that does not exclude other commenting utilities (like Intense Debate, Wordpress, Movable Type) and does not exclude other aggregation services where people comment (like Reddit, Shyftr, Social Median)?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;What about something that will allow bloggers not using Disqus the ability to recieve comments pushed to them from social media community services?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Honestly, there's a lot more we could ask for... it's fun to get excited when 2 services are willing to work together to allow data to move more freely, but let's reserve our feelings of utmost salvation for an open solution that empowers multiple services and publishers to all enable two-way data flow among their applications and properties.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Matt Shaulis</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 01:46:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: Disqus' Partner Strategy: Is FriendFeed Integration Up Next?</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2008/05/disqus-partner-strategy-is-friendfeed.html#comment-550897</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Let's consider ideal solutions for a second (something nobody has, but with enough debate and willingness among service providers, something we can inch closer and closer to): Nothing should "force" a users comment to go back to the originating source. That option should be left unto the person making the comment... as should the original source's *option* to accept/display that comment if/when it does come back to them... It's not about magically shuffling all the data around, it's about creators choice.  Blog authors *choice* to display the comments they want to display under their post; Comment authors *choice* to share their opinion with a group of friends, the world at large, the author of the content being commented on, or not, etc.  Most people are abandoning the concept of free choice in this debate. Right now it's a carnival of: "how can we teach our machines to whisper to each other and parse the entire conversation between this service and that service..."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This notion that every comment belongs in a single place is beyond silly... it's dangerously ignorant of the volume of conversation that is possible in today's social media landscape. To take every comment left on one of Scoble's or Arrington's posts, form all over the web, and try to aggregate it into a single thread of comments under the original blog post will render that thread of comments completely valueless and impossible to follow. Talking about this like there is some mysterious "one size fits all" solution that will seat us all on a bullet train to Happy-Town is doing nothing to reach an optimal solution.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Perhaps what we need is a "Pact" that ALL services (from blog software providers, to aggregation services, to comment management services) can become a part of that aims to provide a solution "protocol" that considers all the *people's rights* and possible *options*... (Note I carefully chose the word "protocol" versus "platform"): MicroFormats or Meta Identification for "comment repository" (for fetching existing conversation) and "comment receptacle" (for contributing to the conversation) come to mind.  It's not about services going behind a curtain and "teaming up" to wrangle anything... it's about open specifications that bar none from participation. I am more than willing to participate in open discussions with service providers, bloggers, community members, everyone... Open standard implementations are the answer here, and it's not gonna happen overnight, but as long as the ethos of "partnerships" and proprietary APIs are the modus operandi, then this thing will never get better.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Matt Shaulis</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 13:39:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: Disqus' Partner Strategy: Is FriendFeed Integration Up Next?</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2008/05/disqus-partner-strategy-is-friendfeed.html#comment-550228</link><description>&lt;p&gt;If Disqus integrates FriendFeed, I would be insanely happy! The WP plugin is great, but it still looks a little chopped up  to have 2 sets of comments. To have it all streamlined would be amazing. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">sarahintampa</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 12:25:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: Disqus' Partner Strategy: Is FriendFeed Integration Up Next?</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2008/05/disqus-partner-strategy-is-friendfeed.html#comment-549218</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Same here, I have only recently just signed up but I rate it highly, integration with FriendFeed would be great. I am on Blogger and there is no FriendFeed plugin yet for the site like WordPress so something like this would be well received!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Joe Dawson</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 10:22:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: Disqus' Partner Strategy: Is FriendFeed Integration Up Next?</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2008/05/disqus-partner-strategy-is-friendfeed.html#comment-548590</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yep.  There's just too many content creators already.  And majority are not even creators but aggregators or republishers.  It's time to get a real communication going - discussions.  Two-way.  One blast, discuss all we want.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;DISQUS is the perfect tool.  They have "categories" within discussions which I haven't even touched yet.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Yohan Yukiya 사요한 謝雪矢</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 08:46:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: Disqus' Partner Strategy: Is FriendFeed Integration Up Next?</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2008/05/disqus-partner-strategy-is-friendfeed.html#comment-548263</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Comment is King. The creation of conversation across the web seems to now be coming together in a useable and consistent way.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">(notnixon)</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 07:30:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: Disqus' Partner Strategy: Is FriendFeed Integration Up Next?</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2008/05/disqus-partner-strategy-is-friendfeed.html#comment-548207</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Daniel confirmed that they were working on two-way integration with FF in a reply to a comment I posted at the Disqus blog a month ago (see the bottom of &lt;a href="http://blog.disqus.net/2008/03/24/add-your-disqus-profile-on-friendfeed/)" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://blog.disqus.net/2008/03/24/add-your-disqus-profile-on-friendfeed/)"&gt;http://blog.disqus.net/2008...&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This means that that if I reply to a comment on FriendFeed for a blog which supports Disqus, it will show up back on the originating blog. And that will be a MAJOR step forward for me. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ian Betteridge</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 07:10:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: Disqus' Partner Strategy: Is FriendFeed Integration Up Next?</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2008/05/disqus-partner-strategy-is-friendfeed.html#comment-548157</link><description>&lt;p&gt;here i am replying on disqus instead of on &lt;a href="http://louisgray.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="louisgray.com"&gt;louisgray.com&lt;/a&gt; or on my site (as you posted here).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;the usage of your blog, and my blog are different.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">centernetworks</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 06:49:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: Disqus' Partner Strategy: Is FriendFeed Integration Up Next?</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2008/05/disqus-partner-strategy-is-friendfeed.html#comment-548155</link><description>&lt;p&gt;hey louis- you got fred love - that's awesome - I hope to get that one day!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">centernetworks</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 06:47:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: Disqus' Partner Strategy: Is FriendFeed Integration Up Next?</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2008/05/disqus-partner-strategy-is-friendfeed.html#comment-548064</link><description>&lt;p&gt;the answer is not just FF=&amp;gt;disqus, but FF=&amp;gt; disqus, intense debate, wordpress, typepad, blogger, etc, etc&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;but disqus is probably the best starting point&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;actually, there's a WP plugin that does FF=&amp;gt;&lt;a href="http://wp.org" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="wp.org"&gt;wp.org&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/friendfeed-comments/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/friendfeed-comments/"&gt;http://wordpress.org/extend...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;so it's happening already. this is a good thing, a very good thing&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fredwilson</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 06:05:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: Disqus' Partner Strategy: Is FriendFeed Integration Up Next?</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2008/05/disqus-partner-strategy-is-friendfeed.html#comment-547958</link><description>&lt;p&gt;FriendFeed comments need improving. Disqus is most definitely the way to go. Fingers crossed that this does happen. FriendFeed would reach a whole new level with the Disqus commenting system.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Michael McGimpsey</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 05:07:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: Disqus' Partner Strategy: Is FriendFeed Integration Up Next?</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2008/05/disqus-partner-strategy-is-friendfeed.html#comment-547949</link><description>&lt;p&gt;awesome post, well done!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tjgillies</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 05:02:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: Disqus' Partner Strategy: Is FriendFeed Integration Up Next?</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2008/05/disqus-partner-strategy-is-friendfeed.html#comment-547855</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Can't agree more.  Thanks to DISQUS, I can now keep up with the DISQUS-sions.  (seriously :p and I discover new blogs too!)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Yohan Yukiya 사요한 謝雪矢</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 04:12:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: Disqus' Partner Strategy: Is FriendFeed Integration Up Next?</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2008/05/disqus-partner-strategy-is-friendfeed.html#comment-547822</link><description>&lt;p&gt;But in offline conversations, we do not have a means of communicating "worldwide" so we don't need such "ownership" concept and whatnot.  In the world wide web, things evolved where we need "ownership" and being able to follow the conversation.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;We say that 2 brains is better than one.  Well, if we can follow conversations regardless of platform, then we are slowly building a world-conscience, a world-discussion.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;SezWho+DISQUS+FriendFeed will be the power-trio in my PoV.  And I like to add &lt;a href="http://Outbrain.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="Outbrain.com"&gt;Outbrain.com&lt;/a&gt; to the list.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Yohan Yukiya 사요한 謝雪矢</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 03:58:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: Disqus' Partner Strategy: Is FriendFeed Integration Up Next?</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2008/05/disqus-partner-strategy-is-friendfeed.html#comment-547814</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I strongly agree.  I comment more often on DISQUS enabled sites than those that still use their native/built-in comment system.  And I don't even use FriendFeed's Comment system even though some WP blogs have it &lt;strong&gt;below/after&lt;/strong&gt; DISQUS.  The key requirement is a hassle - I just want to leave a comment.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The partnership that could develop will really finally complete the migration to "Comments 2.0" (yeah 2.0 again).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;SezWho+DISQUS+FriendFeed, what else could we ask for?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Yohan Yukiya 사요한 謝雪矢</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 03:53:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: Disqus' Partner Strategy: Is FriendFeed Integration Up Next?</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2008/05/disqus-partner-strategy-is-friendfeed.html#comment-547627</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I would love to see SezWho, FriendFeed, Disqus and the orginating blog play int he same sandbox. I have so many demands on my time already that keeping up with the conversation often gets lost in the shuffle.  @geechee_girl&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Leslie Poston</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 02:43:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: Disqus' Partner Strategy: Is FriendFeed Integration Up Next?</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2008/05/disqus-partner-strategy-is-friendfeed.html#comment-547455</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I made this comment &lt;a href="http://www.winextra.com/2008/05/28/just-a-wacky-idea/#comment-547450" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.winextra.com/2008/05/28/just-a-wacky-idea/#comment-547450"&gt;on Steven's blog&lt;/a&gt; a minute ago:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;Hey guys, just a note: our API does have a write-back method. The docs are online but not public just yet. It's being used/tested by some services.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">obscurelyfamous</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 01:31:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: Disqus' Partner Strategy: Is FriendFeed Integration Up Next?</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2008/05/disqus-partner-strategy-is-friendfeed.html#comment-547201</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm liking Disqus so far, having been testing it on a largely unused site the past few days.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I'd appreciate the FF integration. It would certainly tip me toward installing Disqus on my production sites.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chris Baskind</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 00:19:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: Disqus' Partner Strategy: Is FriendFeed Integration Up Next?</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2008/05/disqus-partner-strategy-is-friendfeed.html#comment-546991</link><description>&lt;p&gt;what a coincidence :-)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/05/28/bloggers-get-paid-with-comments/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/05/28/bloggers-get-paid-with-comments/"&gt;http://www.mathewingram.com...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mathewi</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 23:40:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: Disqus' Partner Strategy: Is FriendFeed Integration Up Next?</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2008/05/disqus-partner-strategy-is-friendfeed.html#comment-546984</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes, I saw that. Good work. I logged into Google Reader, and saw your post just after mine. You know what they say about minds that think alike...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Louis Gray</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 23:38:03 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>