<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>louisgray.com - Latest Comments in As Twitter Regains Footing, Competitors' Growth Stalls</title><link>http://louisgray.disqus.com/</link><description>A Silicon Valley Blog for Early Adopters and Tech Geeks</description><atom:link href="https://louisgray.disqus.com/louisgraycom_as_twitter_regains_footing_competitors_growth_stalls/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 12:29:22 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: As Twitter Regains Footing, Competitors' Growth Stalls</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2008/09/as-twitter-regains-footing-competitors.html#comment-2386333</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I posted last month on my blog about Twitter and why I started using it and today I find I don't go long without setting up Twhirl to see what is going on.  I think Twhirl is why I keep going back, but the people I have found to follow are the reason I haven't lost interest.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Twitter may of reached the tipping point.  I think a combination of factors is coming together for them.  The platform seems to be stable now and users are spending time tweeting about events and not Fail Whales.  The number of users is growing and exposing even more to the service.  And for me the most important part is the users themselves.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Like I said before, I have been able to find users that are knowledgeable and post interesting stuff.  &lt;br&gt;When the Olympics were going on, I found people covering different aspects of the events.  Now during the political campaigns, I see posts about issues.  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">StevenWillis</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 12:29:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: As Twitter Regains Footing, Competitors' Growth Stalls</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2008/09/as-twitter-regains-footing-competitors.html#comment-2384467</link><description>&lt;p&gt;And a good one at that.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nicolai</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 10:10:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: As Twitter Regains Footing, Competitors' Growth Stalls</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2008/09/as-twitter-regains-footing-competitors.html#comment-2384031</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Both sites are counted - that is, if the term for &lt;a href="http://beta.friendfeed.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="beta.friendfeed.com"&gt;beta.friendfeed.com&lt;/a&gt; is "site". I just checked it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nicolai</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 09:33:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: As Twitter Regains Footing, Competitors' Growth Stalls</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2008/09/as-twitter-regains-footing-competitors.html#comment-2367806</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Gee, you think that's because Twitter -bought- summize and is busily integrating features from Summize into the main site?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">netik</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 21:50:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: As Twitter Regains Footing, Competitors' Growth Stalls</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2008/09/as-twitter-regains-footing-competitors.html#comment-2366695</link><description>&lt;p&gt;If we haven't already, making twitter accounts to announce our latests posts is another great way to use twitter.&lt;br&gt;Great, I've turned into a Twitter commercial...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anthony Farrior</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 19:51:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: As Twitter Regains Footing, Competitors' Growth Stalls</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2008/09/as-twitter-regains-footing-competitors.html#comment-2365910</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I was wondering if that was the case :-)  I'll have to check out some  &lt;br&gt;of the other &lt;a href="http://Laconi.ca" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="Laconi.ca"&gt;Laconi.ca&lt;/a&gt; instances and do a follow up post to yours.   &lt;br&gt;Great findings though Louis!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jesse Stay</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 18:42:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: As Twitter Regains Footing, Competitors' Growth Stalls</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2008/09/as-twitter-regains-footing-competitors.html#comment-2365834</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Pete, your point on Summize's traffic pointing to Twitter, and  &lt;br&gt;therefore accounting for a good chunk of the service's rise in Web  &lt;br&gt;traffic, is undoubtedly spot on. Thanks for bringing that up, as I,  &lt;br&gt;and everyone else so far, had overlooked that fact.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Of course, if the Summize integration were to account for Twitter's  &lt;br&gt;growth shown here, then it calls the entire premise into doubt, with  &lt;br&gt;the exception of the pronounced decline for the competition.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Louis Gray</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 18:37:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: As Twitter Regains Footing, Competitors' Growth Stalls</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2008/09/as-twitter-regains-footing-competitors.html#comment-2364908</link><description>&lt;p&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nicolai</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 17:32:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: As Twitter Regains Footing, Competitors' Growth Stalls</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2008/09/as-twitter-regains-footing-competitors.html#comment-2364319</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think &lt;br&gt;Twitter still accelerated their growth. &lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://siteanalytics.compete.com/summize.com+twitter.com/?metric=uv" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://siteanalytics.compete.com/summize.com+twitter.com/?metric=uv"&gt;http://siteanalytics.compet...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The growth of Twitter outpaces the number of Summize&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dennis Goedegebuure</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 16:46:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: As Twitter Regains Footing, Competitors' Growth Stalls</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2008/09/as-twitter-regains-footing-competitors.html#comment-2363996</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think a big part of the growth is actually from the summize acquisition which now redirects to the twitter domain. See the growth here. &lt;a href="http://siteanalytics.compete.com/summize.com/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://siteanalytics.compete.com/summize.com/"&gt;http://siteanalytics.compet...&lt;/a&gt;  The summize traffic growth halts as twitter now gets credit for the searches. You add the organic growth from twitter search/summize to the steady organic growth of the stable twitter and you see the nice pop in traffic. I think the traffic from this acquisition is accountable for the majority of twitter's recent growth.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Pete Flint</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 16:18:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: As Twitter Regains Footing, Competitors' Growth Stalls</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2008/09/as-twitter-regains-footing-competitors.html#comment-2363801</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://Identi.ca" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="Identi.ca"&gt;Identi.ca&lt;/a&gt; was defintely hype.  Twitter has gone main stream for me, just check the #Ike tag and see al lthe different people on it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Yammer to me is the most interesting recent development.  I'd love to see those features and stability on the Twitter platform, but I'll run them both side by side for now.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Heard a rumor that Twhirl was going to allow you to manage both from their app.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">evbart</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 16:04:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: As Twitter Regains Footing, Competitors' Growth Stalls</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2008/09/as-twitter-regains-footing-competitors.html#comment-2363258</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I once heard Garyvee say "wait till Oprah gets on Twitter" it may just be a matter of time....&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kevin Fox</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 15:22:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: As Twitter Regains Footing, Competitors' Growth Stalls</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2008/09/as-twitter-regains-footing-competitors.html#comment-2361983</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The article presents the data without explaining that &lt;a href="http://Identi.ca" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="Identi.ca"&gt;Identi.ca&lt;/a&gt;'s users can splinter off into smaller networks and stay connected to the mothership.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brianjesse</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 13:43:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: As Twitter Regains Footing, Competitors' Growth Stalls</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2008/09/as-twitter-regains-footing-competitors.html#comment-2361810</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Friendfeed became (to me) over-run with bloggers and their hanger ons. Maybe I'm not following the right people, but a few hundred bacon posts accompanied by a thousand comments (half of which get buried) just really isn't holding my interest.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Wayne Schulz</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 13:29:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: As Twitter Regains Footing, Competitors' Growth Stalls</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2008/09/as-twitter-regains-footing-competitors.html#comment-2361581</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Jesse, your comment to &lt;a href="http://Identi.ca" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="Identi.ca"&gt;Identi.ca&lt;/a&gt; on Saturday was one of the pieces that prompted me to check this out.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Via: &lt;a href="http://friendfeed.com/e/f0e54170-ba0a-2c91-a96a-dccd8a2a0c10/Is-it-just-me-or-has-identi-ca-really-lost/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://friendfeed.com/e/f0e54170-ba0a-2c91-a96a-dccd8a2a0c10/Is-it-just-me-or-has-identi-ca-really-lost/"&gt;http://friendfeed.com/e/f0e...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You wrote, “Is it just me or has &lt;a href="http://identi.ca" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="identi.ca"&gt;identi.ca&lt;/a&gt; really lost activity lately?” &lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Louis Gray</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 13:13:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: As Twitter Regains Footing, Competitors' Growth Stalls</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2008/09/as-twitter-regains-footing-competitors.html#comment-2361565</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes, the federated nature of &lt;a href="http://identi.ca" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="identi.ca"&gt;identi.ca&lt;/a&gt; makes calculating all their users difficult. But what this data does show is that the most visible, most discussed instance of &lt;a href="http://laconi.ca" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="laconi.ca"&gt;laconi.ca&lt;/a&gt; has decreased month over month.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Louis Gray</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 13:11:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: As Twitter Regains Footing, Competitors' Growth Stalls</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2008/09/as-twitter-regains-footing-competitors.html#comment-2361439</link><description>&lt;p&gt;@Jesse -- At the MicroBlogging summit on Friday, Leo Laporte mentioned that he now had around 5000 MicroBloggers at &lt;a href="http://twit.army.tv" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://twit.army.tv"&gt;http://twit.army.tv&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Those people can "Follow" others at of any of the approximately 150-200 federated openmicroblogging services, and a given service could be running &lt;a href="http://Laconi.ca" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="Laconi.ca"&gt;Laconi.ca&lt;/a&gt; or OpenMicroBlogger software. This is similar to how e-mail, FTP works -- you can choose your software as long as it adheres to the specification.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;@nikan -- I agree with you (and Jesse apparently is coming around) -- it's not correct to say that &lt;a href="http://identi.ca" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="identi.ca"&gt;identi.ca&lt;/a&gt; is dying without mentioning the freedom its users enjoy.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;-- Brian&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brianjesse</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 13:02:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: As Twitter Regains Footing, Competitors' Growth Stalls</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2008/09/as-twitter-regains-footing-competitors.html#comment-2359931</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I don't think it is correct to include &lt;a href="http://identi.ca" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="identi.ca"&gt;identi.ca&lt;/a&gt; in the comparison. &lt;a href="http://Identi.ca" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="Identi.ca"&gt;Identi.ca&lt;/a&gt; is part of a federation. The aggregated population of all &lt;a href="http://laconi.ca" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="laconi.ca"&gt;laconi.ca&lt;/a&gt; users would be a more appropirate metric. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nikan</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 11:01:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: As Twitter Regains Footing, Competitors' Growth Stalls</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2008/09/as-twitter-regains-footing-competitors.html#comment-2359119</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I too am a bigger fan of FriendFeed than Twitter. That's been clear from my comments all year. But I see no reason that Twitter must lose for FriendFeed to win.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Also, we know &lt;a href="http://Compete.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="Compete.com"&gt;Compete.com&lt;/a&gt; statistics are somewhat suspect, but it's clear, at least to me, that the big user growth at FriendFeed has slowed, while Twitter has renewed. The stats don't have to be right, but I think they do nail the trend.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Louis Gray</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 09:55:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: As Twitter Regains Footing, Competitors' Growth Stalls</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2008/09/as-twitter-regains-footing-competitors.html#comment-2359075</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I tend to see FriendFeed and Twitter having much less of an overlap than some do. I continue to be a staunch supporter and big user of FriendFeed. But Twitter is a core ingredient of what makes FriendFeed go. That said, I definitely feel that the alternative services, like Plurk and &lt;a href="http://Identi.ca" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="Identi.ca"&gt;Identi.ca&lt;/a&gt;, have lost momentum.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Louis Gray</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 09:51:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: As Twitter Regains Footing, Competitors' Growth Stalls</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2008/09/as-twitter-regains-footing-competitors.html#comment-2358980</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Louis - great analysis.  Even though I have a presence on Friendfeed and Plurk, I was never really able to get into them.  They were merely substitutes when Twitter was acting up.  Based on these numbers, it sounds like my story is the same as many others.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In my opinion, Twitter surviving and flourishing is best for the microblogging industry.  More and more of my friends are start to come around on Twitter.  But if they have to decide between Twitter, Plurk, etc then they are more likely to not try anything at all.  One service being the go-to service is best for adoption of the technology&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave Knox</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 09:44:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: As Twitter Regains Footing, Competitors' Growth Stalls</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2008/09/as-twitter-regains-footing-competitors.html#comment-2358650</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Brian, your stat is very interesting to hear.  I still think the future of microblogging isn't necessarily in these services themselves, but in the individual hosted solutions that will be installed at corporations and more.  Twitter can't do that.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jesse Stay</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 09:15:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: As Twitter Regains Footing, Competitors' Growth Stalls</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2008/09/as-twitter-regains-footing-competitors.html#comment-2358615</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'd love to see other &lt;a href="http://laconi.ca" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="laconi.ca"&gt;laconi.ca&lt;/a&gt; instances in this study - I'm curious if traffic for &lt;a href="http://laconi.ca" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="laconi.ca"&gt;laconi.ca&lt;/a&gt; has just been spread thin to other instances, rather than back to Twitter.  Examples like Twit Army, for instance.  I know a few people that have moved over there.  Interesting study though.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jesse Stay</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 09:11:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: As Twitter Regains Footing, Competitors' Growth Stalls</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2008/09/as-twitter-regains-footing-competitors.html#comment-2358370</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Twitter doesn't have pictures.  FriendFeed does.  Pictures are pretty.  I like my microblogging experience to be both text and visually based.  I'm biased of course though as a photographer.  I far prefer FriendFeed over Twitter.  But I was a little surprised seeing compete's last month comparison between FriendFeed and Twitter.  Beyond the pictures issue, FriendFeed seems to be such a superior platform due largely to how they present conversations around posts and media in ways that Twitter does not.  And they do have a great deal of momentum and enough of a strong user base to grow their service at this point.  I used to think that FF would surpass Twitter within 6 months.  Now I'm not as sure.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Thomas Hawk</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 08:43:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: As Twitter Regains Footing, Competitors' Growth Stalls</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2008/09/as-twitter-regains-footing-competitors.html#comment-2357868</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Like STM above, I'm an avid Twitter user while I've abandoned Plurk and &lt;a href="http://identi.ca" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="identi.ca"&gt;identi.ca&lt;/a&gt;. Twitter is where the party is happening so why leave for another micro-blogging service with little or no action. That said, in an ideal world, I'd like to see Pownce do better given it's a good service.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; As well, I'm surprised Friendfeed is seeing flat growth given it's still getting a lot of buzz. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark Evans</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 07:18:39 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>